JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 40 No. 6 924-934
© 1999 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rozanski, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rozanski, A.

Influence of Arrhythmias on Gated SPECT Myocardial Perfusion and Function Quantification

Kenneth Nichols, Sharmila Dorbala, E. Gordon DePuey, Siu-Sun Yao, Atul Sharma and Alan Rozanski

Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Kenneth Nichols, PhD, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University, 622 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032.

ABSTRACT

Despite the importance of R-wave gating myocardial perfusion tomography for ventricular function assessment, neither prevalence of gating errors nor their influence on quantified cardiac parameters has been studied. Methods: Arrhythmia-induced anomalies in curves of counts versus projection angle for each R-wave segment were detected visually and algorithmically. Arrhythmia prevalence was tabulated for 379 patients (group 1) with prospective coronary artery disease (mean age 63 ± 13 y, 47% male). Myocardial counts were analyzed from all reconstructed cinematic midventricular slices to assess arrhythmia effects on percentage of systolic count increase, generally assumed to equal percentage of wall thickening. In a separate retrospective analysis of 41 patients (group 2), with coronary artery disease (mean age 64 ± 12 y, 68% male) having no significant arrhythmias, 36 of whom also underwent equilibrium radionuclide angiography, original projection data were altered to simulate arrhythmia-induced aberrant count patterns to evaluate effects on ventricular function and perfusion measurements. Results: Group 1 patients consisted of 26% without gating errors, 32% with count losses only in the last R-wave interval due to inconsistent transient increase of heart rate, 24% with count decreases in several late intervals due to consistently variable rates, 8% with early interval count increases paired with late interval count decreases due to ectopic beats and 9% with erratic count changes due to atrial fibrillation. Observed count patterns were strongly associated (P < 10-3) with arrhythmias detected by electrocardiogram monitoring. In group 2 simulations, ventricular volumes changed by only 2% ± 9% and ejection fraction (EF) by only 1% ± 4% from control values and correlated linearly (r ≥ 0.96) with control values for all simulated arrhythmias. SPECT and equilibrium radionuclide angiography EFs correlated similarly (r = 0.85–0.89) for control and all simulations. Percentage changes from control in perfusion defect extent and severity were larger than processing reproducibility limits, the largest change being for atrial fibrillation. Control wall thickening was 38% ± 17%, significantly lower (P < 10-6) than for simulated arrhythmias, reflecting similar observations for group 1 patients. Conclusion: Even though ventricular volumes and EFs were affected minimally by arrhythmias, both perfusion analysis and wall thickening were compromised. Consequently, quality assurance of gating may be critically important for obtaining accurate quantified parameters.

Key Words: gated SPECT • arrhythmias • function • perfusion • quality assurance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
R. Sciagra, B. Sotgia, N. Boni, and A. Pupi
Assessment of the Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Gated SPECT Perfusion Data by Comparison with Simultaneously Acquired Nongated SPECT Data
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1283 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
S. Burrell and A. MacDonald
Artifacts and Pitfalls in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2006; 34(4): 193 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
G. M. Currie and J. M. Wheat
Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2005; 33(4): 243 - 243.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. F. Heston and D. M. Sigg
Quantifying Transient Ischemic Dilation Using Gated SPECT
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 1990 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Abidov, R. Hachamovitch, A. Rozanski, S. W. Hayes, M. M. Santos, M. G. Sciammarella, I. Cohen, J. Gerlach, J. D. Friedman, G. Germano, et al.
Prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1062 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
V. Go, M. R. Bhatt, and R. C. Hendel
The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of ECG-Gated SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 912 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. W. Groch, E. G. DePuey, A. C. Belzberg, W. D. Erwin, M. Kamran, C. A. Barnett, R. C. Hendel, S. M. Spies, A. Ali, and R. C. Marshall
Planar Imaging Versus Gated Blood-Pool SPECT for the Assessment of Ventricular Performance: A Multicenter Study
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2001; 42(12): 1773 - 1779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.