|
|
||||||||
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Byung-Tae Kim, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, Korea 135-230.
ABSTRACT
Several tracer kinetic methods have been proposed for quantification of regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) with 13N-ammonia and PET. Merits and limitations specific to each approach, however, generally are not clear, because they have not been evaluated in the same experimental environment. Therefore, we compared six different commonly used methods (11 modifications) to characterize the accuracy of each approach. The methods included the two-parameter model (method 1), the modified two-parameter model (method 2), the four-parameter model (method 3), the graphical analysis (method 4), the first pass extraction method (method 5) and the dose uptake index (DUI; method 6). Methods: Eleven studies in four dogs, 16 studies in eight healthy human volunteers and 14 studies in seven patients were performed using 13N-ammonia and PET. MBF in dogs was varied with dipyndamole and coronary occlusions and was measured independently and simultaneously with microspheres. Volunteers and patients were studied at baseline and after dipyridamole. MBF and DUI were estimated using a time-activity curve (Qi[t]) derived from dynamic images and regions of interest (ROIs) and using the six methods. DUI was defined as Qi(t = 2 mm) x weight/dose. Results: MBF estimated by methods 15 correlated well with microsphere MBF in dogs. MBF estimates by method 1 correlated well with those by methods 2, 4 and 5 and to a lesser degree with those by method 3 in both dog and human studies. DUI correlated poorly with MBF by microspheres and by methods 15 in both dog and human studies. MBF estimates by method 3 showed larger dispersion (SD/mean flow) and higher sensitivity to metabolites correction in arterial blood than those by methods 1, 2, 4 and 5. Conclusion: MBF can be measured accurately using 13N-ammonia PET and tracer kinetic methods. DUI is a poor indicator of MBF values. The results indicate that preference should be given to the two-parameter model, incorporating geometrical ROI representation (method 2) among the compartment models, and to the graphical analysis (method 4) among the noncompartmental approaches.
Key Words: myocardial blood flow 13N-ammonia PET tracer kinetic methods
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. D. Rosen, J. A.C. Lima, K. Nasir, T. Edvardsen, A. R. Folsom, S. Lai, D. A. Bluemke, and M. Jerosch-Herold Lower Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Is Associated With Decreased Regional Left Ventricular Function in Asymptomatic Participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Circulation, July 25, 2006; 114(4): 289 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Watabe, H. Jino, N. Kawachi, N. Teramoto, T. Hayashi, Y. Ohta, and H. Iida Parametric Imaging of Myocardial Blood Flow with 15O-Water and PET Using the Basis Function Method J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1219 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kaufmann and P. G. Camici Myocardial Blood Flow Measurement by PET: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 75 - 88. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okazawa, M. Takahashi, T. Hata, K. Sugimoto, Y. Kishibe, and T. Tsuji Quantitative Evaluation of Myocardial Blood Flow and Ejection Fraction with a Single Dose of 13NH3 and Gated PET J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 999 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. van den Hoff, W. Burchert, A.-R. Borner, H. Fricke, G. Kuhnel, G. J. Meyer, D. Otto, E. Weckesser, H.-G. Wolpers, and W. H. Knapp [1-11C]Acetate as a Quantitative Perfusion Tracer in Myocardial PET J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1174 - 1182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Hutchins What Is the Best Approach to Quantify Myocardial Blood Flow with PET? J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1183 - 1184. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Ellis Human Body Composition: In Vivo Methods Physiol Rev, April 1, 2000; 80(2): 649 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |