JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 40 No. 4 513-521
© 1999 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Véra, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cribier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Véra, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cribier, A.

Thallium-Gated SPECT in Patients with Major Myocardial Infarction: Effect of Filtering and Zooming in Comparison with Equilibrium Radionuclide Imaging and Left Ventriculography

Pierre Véra, Alain Manrique, Valérie Pontvianne, Anne Hitzel, René Koning and Alain Cribier

Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiology, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Pierre Véra, MD, PhD, Henri Becquerel Center, Nuclear Medicine Department, 1 rue d'Amiens, 76000 Rouen, France.

ABSTRACT

The effect of filtering and zooming on 201Tl-gated SPECT was evaluated in patients with major myocardial infarction. Methods: Rest thallium (Tl)-gated SPECT was performed with a 90° dual-head camera, 4 h after injection of 185 MBq 201Tl in 32 patients (mean age 61 ± 11 y) with large myocardial infarction (33% ± 17% defect on bull's eye). End diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated using a commercially available semiautomatic validated software. First, images were reconstructed using a 2.5 zoom, a Butterworth filter (order = 5) and six Nyquist cutoff frequencies: 0.13 (B5.13), 0.15 (B5.15), 0.20 (B5.20), 0.25 (B5.25), 0.30 (B5.30) and 0.35 (B5.35). Second, images were reconstructed using a zoom of 1 and a Butterworth filter (order = 5) (cutoff frequency 0.20 [B5.20Z1]) (total = 32 x 7 = 224 reconstructions). LVEF was calculated in all patients using equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA). EDV, ESV and LVEF were measured with contrast left ventriculography (LVG). Results: LVEF was 39% ± 2% (mean ± SEM) for ERNA and 40% ± 13% for LVG (P = 0.51). Gated SPECT with B5.20Z2.5 simultaneously offered a mean LVEF value (39% ± 2%) similar to ERNA (39% ± 2%) and LVG (40% ± 3%), optimal correlations with both ERNA (r = 0.83) and LVG (r = 0.70) and minimal differences with both ERNA (–0.9% ± 7.5% [mean ± SD]) and LVG (1.1% ± 10.5%). As a function of filter and zoom choice, correlation coefficients between ERNA or LVG LVEF, and gated SPECT ranged from 0.26 to 0.88; and correlation coefficients between LVG and gated SPECT volumes ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. There was a significant effect of filtering and zooming on EDV, ESV and LVEF (P < 0.0001). Low cutoff frequency (B5.13) overestimated LVEF (P < 0.0001 versus ERNA and LVG). Gated SPECT with 2.5 zoom and high cutoff frequencies (B5.15, B5.20, B5.25, B5.30 and B5.35) overestimated EDV and ESV (P < 0.04) compared with LVG. This volume overestimation with Tl-gated SPECT in patients with large myocardial infarction was correlated to the infarct size. A zoom of 1 underestimated EDV, ESV and LVEF compared with a 2.5 zoom (P < 0.02). Conclusion: Accurate LVEF measurement is possible with Tl-gated SPECT in patients with major myocardial infarction. However, filtering and zooming greatly influence EDV, ESV and LVEF measurements, and TI-gated SPECT overestimates left ventricular volumes, particularly when the infarct size increases.

Key Words: gated SPECT • thallium • left ventricular ejection fraction • myocardial infarction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
P.-Y. Marie, W. Djaballah, P. R. Franken, C. Vanhove, M. A. Muller, H. Boutley, S. Poussier, P. Olivier, G. Karcher, and A. Bertrand
OSEM Reconstruction, Associated with Temporal Fourier and Depth-Dependant Resolution Recovery Filtering, Enhances Results from Sestamibi and 201Tl 16-Interval Gated SPECT
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1789 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Vakhtangandze, D O Hall, F V Zananiri, and M R Rees
The effect of Butterworth and Metz reconstruction filters on volume and ejection fraction calculations with 99Tcm gated myocardial SPECT
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2005; 78(932): 733 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Manrique, A. Hitzel, D. Brasse, and P. Vera
Effect of Perfusion Pattern and Imaging Sequence on Gated Perfusion SPECT Evaluation of Myocardial Stunning
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Nanasato, A. Ando, S. Isobe, M. Nonokawa, H. Hirayama, N. Tsuboi, T. Ito, M. Hirai, M. Yokota, and H. Saito
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function Using Electrocardiographically Gated Myocardial SPECT with 123I-Labeled Fatty Acid Analog
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2001; 42(12): 1747 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.