|
|
||||||||
Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiology, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Pierre Véra, MD, PhD, Henri Becquerel Center, Nuclear Medicine Department, 1 rue d'Amiens, 76000 Rouen, France.
ABSTRACT
The effect of filtering and zooming on 201Tl-gated SPECT was evaluated in patients with major myocardial infarction. Methods: Rest thallium (Tl)-gated SPECT was performed with a 90° dual-head camera, 4 h after injection of 185 MBq 201Tl in 32 patients (mean age 61 ± 11 y) with large myocardial infarction (33% ± 17% defect on bull's eye). End diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated using a commercially available semiautomatic validated software. First, images were reconstructed using a 2.5 zoom, a Butterworth filter (order = 5) and six Nyquist cutoff frequencies: 0.13 (B5.13), 0.15 (B5.15), 0.20 (B5.20), 0.25 (B5.25), 0.30 (B5.30) and 0.35 (B5.35). Second, images were reconstructed using a zoom of 1 and a Butterworth filter (order = 5) (cutoff frequency 0.20 [B5.20Z1]) (total = 32 x 7 = 224 reconstructions). LVEF was calculated in all patients using equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA). EDV, ESV and LVEF were measured with contrast left ventriculography (LVG). Results: LVEF was 39% ± 2% (mean ± SEM) for ERNA and 40% ± 13% for LVG (P = 0.51). Gated SPECT with B5.20Z2.5 simultaneously offered a mean LVEF value (39% ± 2%) similar to ERNA (39% ± 2%) and LVG (40% ± 3%), optimal correlations with both ERNA (r = 0.83) and LVG (r = 0.70) and minimal differences with both ERNA (0.9% ± 7.5% [mean ± SD]) and LVG (1.1% ± 10.5%). As a function of filter and zoom choice, correlation coefficients between ERNA or LVG LVEF, and gated SPECT ranged from 0.26 to 0.88; and correlation coefficients between LVG and gated SPECT volumes ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. There was a significant effect of filtering and zooming on EDV, ESV and LVEF (P < 0.0001). Low cutoff frequency (B5.13) overestimated LVEF (P < 0.0001 versus ERNA and LVG). Gated SPECT with 2.5 zoom and high cutoff frequencies (B5.15, B5.20, B5.25, B5.30 and B5.35) overestimated EDV and ESV (P < 0.04) compared with LVG. This volume overestimation with Tl-gated SPECT in patients with large myocardial infarction was correlated to the infarct size. A zoom of 1 underestimated EDV, ESV and LVEF compared with a 2.5 zoom (P < 0.02). Conclusion: Accurate LVEF measurement is possible with Tl-gated SPECT in patients with major myocardial infarction. However, filtering and zooming greatly influence EDV, ESV and LVEF measurements, and TI-gated SPECT overestimates left ventricular volumes, particularly when the infarct size increases.
Key Words: gated SPECT thallium left ventricular ejection fraction myocardial infarction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P.-Y. Marie, W. Djaballah, P. R. Franken, C. Vanhove, M. A. Muller, H. Boutley, S. Poussier, P. Olivier, G. Karcher, and A. Bertrand OSEM Reconstruction, Associated with Temporal Fourier and Depth-Dependant Resolution Recovery Filtering, Enhances Results from Sestamibi and 201Tl 16-Interval Gated SPECT J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1789 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Vakhtangandze, D O Hall, F V Zananiri, and M R Rees The effect of Butterworth and Metz reconstruction filters on volume and ejection fraction calculations with 99Tcm gated myocardial SPECT Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2005; 78(932): 733 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Manrique, A. Hitzel, D. Brasse, and P. Vera Effect of Perfusion Pattern and Imaging Sequence on Gated Perfusion SPECT Evaluation of Myocardial Stunning J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 176 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nanasato, A. Ando, S. Isobe, M. Nonokawa, H. Hirayama, N. Tsuboi, T. Ito, M. Hirai, M. Yokota, and H. Saito Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function Using Electrocardiographically Gated Myocardial SPECT with 123I-Labeled Fatty Acid Analog J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2001; 42(12): 1747 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |