JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 40 No. 3 456-463
© 1999 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Licho, R.
Right arrow Articles by King, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Licho, R.
Right arrow Articles by King, M. A.

Attenuation Compensation in 99mTc SPECT Brain Imaging: A Comparison of the Use of Attenuation Maps Derived from Transmission Versus Emission Data in Normal Scans

Robert Licho, Stephen J. Glick, Weishi Xia, Tin-Su Pan, Bill C. Penney and Michael A. King

Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Robert Licho, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655.

ABSTRACT

Brain SPECT imaging using 99mTc lipophilic tracers such as hexamethyl propyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) attempts to estimate cerebral, cerebellar and subcortical perfusion by assessing the relative amount of tracer uptake among these regions. Most commonly, comparison is made with cerebellar activity. Because the assessment of relative tracer uptake may be rendered inaccurate by photon attenuation by the nonuniform attenuation properties of the head, brain SPECT reconstructions have been compared using attenuation correction (AC) with various methods for estimating the attenuation map. Methods: Patients underwent 99mTc-HMPAO brain SPECT with transmission line source AC hardware. In addition to the emission dataset, emission downscatter and transmission datasets were acquired. Iterative reconstructions using three different attenuation maps were investigated. These included: (a) that obtained from transmission imaging, (b) that obtained from segmentation of a reconstruction from a lower energy Compton scatter window and (c) a slice-independent, uniform, elliptical attenuation map. No AC was also compared. Results: Count profiles in patients having brain perfusion SPECT scans showed a significant difference in region count estimates in the brain depending on whether AC is used as well as on the attenuation map used. Scatter-based AC is able to provide external contour detection and attenuation compensation based on that contour, whereas transmission-based AC provides external contour detection as well as internal, nonuniform attenuation estimation and AC. If one considers transmission AC to be the clinical "gold standard," non-attenuation-corrected as well as fixed-ellipsoid, uniform attenuation-corrected studies provided unreliable regional estimates of tracer activity. Conclusion: This study shows the significant difference in clinical brain SPECT count profiles depending on how and whether there is compensation for attenuation. Based on prior studies validating the improved quantitative accuracy of SPECT using transmission-based AC, this study suggests that clinical 99mTc brain perfusion SPECT would benefit from and, in situations demanding rigorous quantitative assessment, requires transmission-based AC. Estimating attenuation maps with scatter-based methods was the next most accurate (clinical) method tested and can be used if and when transmission imaging cannot be used.

Key Words: brain SPECT • neuro-SPECT • brain perfusion • attenuation correction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Accorsi
Brain Single-Photon Emission CT Physics Principles
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1247 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. El Fakhri, M. F. Kijewski, M. S. Albert, K. A. Johnson, and S. C. Moore
Quantitative SPECT Leads to Improved Performance in Discrimination Tasks Related to Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2026 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. M. Kim, A. Varrone, H. Watabe, M. Shidahara, M. Fujita, R. B. Innis, and H. Iida
Contribution of Scatter and Attenuation Compensation to SPECT Images of Nonuniformly Distributed Brain Activities
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 512 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Zaidi and B. Hasegawa
Determination of the Attenuation Map in Emission Tomography
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 291 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Van Laere, M. Koole, T. Kauppinen, M. Monsieurs, L. Bouwens, and R. Dierck
Nonuniform Transmission in Brain SPECT Using 201Tl, 153Gd, and 99mTc Static Line Sources: Anthropomorphic Dosimetry Studies and Influence on Brain Quantification
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2000; 41(12): 2051 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.