JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 40 No. 11 1947-1966
© 1999 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouchet, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bolch, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouchet, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bolch, W. E.

A Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Determining Absorbed Fractions of Energy for Electrons Within Trabecular Bone

Lionel G. Bouchet, Derek W. Jokisch and Wesley E. Bolch

Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Wesley E. Bolch, PhD, Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8300.

ABSTRACT

Bone marrow is generally the dose-limiting organ of concern in radioimmunotherapy and in radionuclide palliation of bone pain. However, skeletal dosimetry is complicated by the intricate nature of its microstructure, which can vary greatly throughout skeletal regions. In this article, a new three-dimensional electron transport model for trabecular bone is introduced, based on Monte Carlo transport and on bone microstructure information for several trabecular bone sites. Methods: Marrow cavity and trabecular chord length distributions originally published by Spiers et al. were randomly sampled to create alternating regions of bone, endosteum and marrow during the three-dimensional transport of single electrons. For the marrow spaces, explicit consideration of the site-specific elemental composition was made in the transport calculations based on the percentage of active and inactive marrow in each region. The electron transport was performed with the EGS4 electron transport code and the parameter reduced electron-step transport algorithm. Electron absorbed fractions of energy were tabulated for seven adult trabecular bone sites, considering three source and target regions: the trabecular marrow space (IMS), the trabecular bone endosteum (TBE) and the trabecular bone volume (TBV). Results: For all source-target combinations, the absorbed fraction was seen to vary widely within the skeleton. These variations can be directly attributed to the differences in the trabecular microstructure of the different skeletal regions. For many source-target combinations, substantial energy dependence was seen in the calculated absorbed fraction, a factor not considered in values recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). A one-dimensional model of electron transport in trabecular bone, based on range-energy relation ships, was also developed to verify the three-dimensional transport model and to evaluate differences between the two modeling approaches. Differences of ~10%–15% were seen, particularly at low electron energies. In the case of a TBV source and a TMS target (or vice versa), differences >50% were seen in the absorbed fraction. Conclusion: The three-dimensional model of electron transport in trabecular bone allows improved estimates of skeletal absorbed fractions. The model highlights both the regional and the energy dependency of the absorbed fraction not previously considered in the ICRP model.

Key Words: dosimetry • trabecular bone • absorbed fractions • Monte Carlo transport • EGS4




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Sgouros
Toward Patient-Friendly Cell-Level Dosimetry
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 496 - 497.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. A. Gersh, M. Dingfelder, and L. H. Toburen
Monte Carlo modelling of energy deposition in trabecular bone
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2006; 122(1-4): 549 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. J. Watchman, D. W. Jokisch, P. W. Patton, D. A. Rajon, G. Sgouros, and W. E. Bolch
Absorbed Fractions for {alpha}-Particles in Tissues of Trabecular Bone: Considerations of Marrow Cellularity Within the ICRP Reference Male
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1171 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. P. Shah, W. E. Bolch, D. A. Rajon, P. W. Patton, and D. W. Jokisch
A Paired-Image Radiation Transport Model for Skeletal Dosimetry
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 344 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Sgouros
Dosimetry of Internal Emitters
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 18S - 27S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Liepe, R. Hliscs, J. Kropp, R. Runge, F. F. Knapp Jr., and W.-G. Franke
Dosimetry of 188Re-Hydroxyethylidene Diphosphonate in Human Prostate Cancer Skeletal Metastases
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 953 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. P. Shah, P. W. Patton, D. A. Rajon, and W. E. Bolch
Adipocyte Spatial Distributions in Bone Marrow: Implications for Skeletal Dosimetry Models
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 774 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. E. Bolch, P. W. Patton, D. A. Rajon, A. P. Shah, D. W. Jokisch, and B. A. Inglis
Considerations of Marrow Cellularity in 3-Dimensional Dosimetric Models of the Trabecular Skeleton
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2002; 43(1): 97 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.