JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 39 No. 3 516-521
© 1998 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palermo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Turra, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palermo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Turra, S.

Comparison of Technetium-99m-MDP, Technetium-99m-WBC and Technetium-99m-HIG in Musculoskeletal Inflammation

Franco Palermo, Franco Boccaletto, Adolfo Paolin, Antonio Carniato, Paolo Zoli, Fernando Giusto and Sisto Turra

Nuclear Medicine Unit, Critical Care Unit and Orthopedic Division of Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Prof. Franco Palermo, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy.

ABSTRACT

This study compared three radionuclide techniques in distinguishing musculoskeletal infection from noninfectious inflammation. Methods: Thirty-five orthopedic patients with suspected musculoskeletal infection were examined using three radionuclide tech niques in sequence: triphasic bone scintigraphy, 99mTc radioleukocytes (99mTc-WBC)scintigraphy and 99mTc human immunoglobulin 99mTc-Hig) scintigraphy. Two "early" and "late" acquisitions were performed, at 4–6 hr and 20–24 hr postinjection, respectively. Patients who were diagnosed as suffering from noninflammatory lesions became the controls. We calcu"late"d for all studies one index of inflammation (Infl) as the ratio between counts in the uptake area and counts in an equal area of normal tissue. Results: The "early" radiolabeled leukocytes and "late" Hig scintigraphy allowed the greatest ability to distinguish between infections and noninfectious inflammations (p < 0.01 land p < 0.016) with a sensitivity of 96.6% and 96.5% and specificity of 71% and 100%, respectively. Hig and radioleukocytes allowed distinguishing infections from non inflammatory diseases at both examinations. Conclusion: The "early" radioleukocyte scintigraphy allowed us to separate infections from noninfectious inflammations. In contrast, the same result can be obtained only with the "late" scan in the Hig study, but Hig mapped the spread of the inflammation into soft tissues better. Hig might be an alternative to radioleukocytes because of its simple preparation, similar accuracy and safety.

Key Words: inflammation • orthopedic disease • triphasic bone scan • leukocyte scan • immunoscintigraphy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Reinartz, T. Mumme, B. Hermanns, U. Cremerius, D. C. Wirtz, W. M. Schaefer, F.-U. Niethard, and U. Buell
Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS TRIPLE-PHASE BONE SCANNING
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 465 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.