| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Division of Hematology and Oncology,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Carl K. Hoh, MD, UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, CHS, AR-128, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-6942.
ABSTRACT
This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET on a patient and lesion basis using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the detection of tumor foci in patients with suspected recurrent or metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma. Methods: Whole-body FDG-PET imaging was performed on 57 patients with a previous history of breast carcinoma who were referred for a clinical suspicion of disease recurrence. Whole-body PET images were scored from 1 (definitely negative) to 5 (definitely positive) by three independent observers, and discrepancies were resolved by a fourth observer. Patients were clinically followed for up to 24 mo to assess the accuracy of PET diagnosis by biopsy, follow-up imaging and other diagnostic tests. Results: PET scans showed that there were 41 sites indicating recurrent or metastatic disease in 29 patients. There were 38 sites in 28 patients that showed no evidence for malignant disease. On a patient basis, with scores 4 or 5 considered to be positive, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 79%, respectively. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 82% and 92%. On a lesion basis, with scores 4 or 5 considered to be positive, the sensitivity was 85% and specificity 79%. The area index in receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.91 for patient-based analysis and 0.88 for lesion-based analysis. To determine the cause for false-negative and false-positive findings more precisely, false-negative lesions with scores of 3 or lower and false-positive lesions with scores of 4 or higher were analyzed. Bone metastases had a significantly larger proportion of false-negative lesions than other nonosseous malignant sites (p < 0.05). False-positive lesions were due to muscle uptake (n = 5), inflammation (n = 4), blood pool activity in the great vessels (n = 2), bowel uptake (n = 1) and unknown causes (n = 6). Conclusion: The whole-body FDG-PET scan is a useful diagnostic test for detecting recurrent or metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma. However, the sensitivity for metastases to bone appears to be lower than that to other organs. Specificity may be improved by more strict attention to patient preparation and better recognition of physiologic skeletal muscle or artifactual uptakes.
Key Words: whole-body PET • breast cancer • fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. MacDonald and S. Burrell Infrequently Performed Studies in Nuclear Medicine: Part 1 J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2008; 36(3): 132 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. C. Hodgson and K. Y. Gulenchyn Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging? J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 712 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. S. Lim, W. Yoon, T. W. Chung, J. K. Kim, J. G. Park, H. K. Kang, H. S. Bom, and J. H. Yoon FDG PET/CT for the Detection and Evaluation of Breast Diseases: Usefulness and Limitations RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S197 - S213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Rosen, W. B. Eubank, and D. A. Mankoff FDG PET, PET/CT, and Breast Cancer Imaging RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S215 - S229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Veit-Haibach, G Antoch, T Beyer, H Stergar, R Schleucher, E A M Hauth, and A Bockisch FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 508 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ito, K. Kato, M. Ikeda, S. Iwano, N. Makino, M. Tadokoro, S. Abe, S. Nakano, M. Nishino, T. Ishigaki, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Bone Metastases of Thyroid Cancer J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 889 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Moy, F. Ponzo, M. E. Noz, G. Q. Maguire Jr., A. D. Murphy-Walcott, A. E. Deans, M. T. Kitazono, L. Travascio, and E. L. Kramer Improving Specificity of Breast MRI Using Prone PET and Fused MRI and PET 3D Volume Datasets J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 528 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend PET/CT: Form and Function Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Couturier, G. Jerusalem, J.-M. N'Guyen, and R. Hustinx Sequential Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Monitoring Response to Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6437 - 6443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Juweid and B. D. Cheson Positron-Emission Tomography and Assessment of Cancer Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., February 2, 2006; 354(5): 496 - 507. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. T. Williams, S. Smith, and T. Uematsu FDG PET and SPECT of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1651 - 1653. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Tran, B. S. Pio, B. Khatibi, J. Czernin, M. E. Phelps, and D. H.S. Silverman 18F-FDG PET for Staging Breast Cancer in Patients with Inner-Quadrant Versus Outer-Quadrant Tumors: Comparison with Long-Term Clinical Outcome J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1455 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Even-Sapir Imaging of Malignant Bone Involvement by Morphologic, Scintigraphic, and Hybrid Modalities J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1356 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al. Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2785 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Uematsu, S. Yuen, S. Yukisawa, T. Aramaki, N. Morimoto, M. Endo, H. Furukawa, Y. Uchida, and J. Watanabe Comparison of FDG PET and SPECT for Detection of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1266 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Eubank, D. Mankoff, M. Bhattacharya, J. Gralow, H. Linden, G. Ellis, S. Lindsley, M. Austin-Seymour, and R. Livingston Impact of FDG PET on Defining the Extent of Disease and on the Treatment of Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 479 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Hamaoka, J. E. Madewell, D. A. Podoloff, G. N. Hortobagyi, and N. T. Ueno Bone Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2942 - 2953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Rohren, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 305 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Yoshioka, K. Yamaguchi, K. Kubota, T. Saginoya, T. Yamazaki, T. Ido, G. Yamaura, H. Takahashi, H. Fukuda, and R. Kanamaru Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Advanced, Metastatic, or Recurrent Gastric Cancer J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 690 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Kostakoglu, H. Agress Jr, and S. J. Goldsmith Clinical Role of FDG PET in Evaluation of Cancer Patients RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 315 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.-S. Liu, Y.-Y. Shen, C.-C. Lin, R.-F. Yen, and C.-H. Kao Clinical Impact of [18F]FDG-PET in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Breast Cancer Based on Asymptomatically Elevated Tumor Marker Serum Levels: a Preliminary Report Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2002; 32(7): 244 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Y. Charvolin, R. J. Salmon, A. Pecking, and V. Mareschal Positron Emission Tomography Detection of Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Uterus Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2002; 99(5): 915 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Vranjesevic, J. E. Filmont, J. Meta, D. H. Silverman, M. E. Phelps, J. Rao, P. E. Valk, and J. Czernin Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET and Conventional Imaging for Predicting Outcome in Previously Treated Breast Cancer Patients J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 325 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Eubank, D. A. Mankoff, H. J. Vesselle, J. F. Eary, E. K. Schubert, L. K. Dunnwald, S. K. Lindsley, J. R. Gralow, M. M. Austin-Seymour, G. K. Ellis, et al. Detection of Locoregional and Distant Recurrences in Breast Cancer Patients by Using FDG PET RadioGraphics, January 1, 2002; 22(1): 5 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Eubank, D. A. Mankoff, J. Takasugi, H. Vesselle, J. F. Eary, T. J. Shanley, J. R. Gralow, A. Charlop, G. K. Ellis, K. L. Lindsley, et al. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Detect Mediastinal or Internal Mammary Metastases in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2001; 19(15): 3516 - 3523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Tucker, M. Coel, J. Ko, P. Morris, G. Druger, and P. McGuigan Impact of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography on Patient Management: First Year's Experience in a Clinical Center J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2504 - 2508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Gambhir, J. Czernin, J. Schwimmer, D. H. S. Silverman, R. E. Coleman, and M. E. Phelps A Tabulated Summary of the FDG PET Literature J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2001; 42(90050): 1S - 93. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.F. Vansteenkiste and S.G. Stroobants The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. P. van Rijk and A. J. van Dongen Limited Angle, Limited Approach? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2000; 41(11): 1859 - 1860. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Avril, C. A. Rose, M. Schelling, J. Dose, W. Kuhn, S. Bense, W. Weber, S. Ziegler, H. Graeff, and M. Schwaiger Breast Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose: Use and Limitations J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2000; 18(20): 3495 - 3502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Schelling, N. Avril, J. Nahrig, W. Kuhn, W. Romer, D. Sattler, M. Werner, J. Dose, F. Janicke, H. Graeff, et al. Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2000; 18(8): 1689 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. B. Hathaway, D. A. Mankoff, K. R. Maravilla, M. M. Austin-Seymour, G. K. Ellis, J. R. Gralow, A. A. Cortese, C. E. Hayes, and R. E. Moe Value of Combined FDG PET and MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Suspected Recurrent Local-Regional Breast Cancer: Preliminary Experience Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 807 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
