HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stodilka, R. Z. Articles by Nicholson, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stodilka, R. Z. Articles by Nicholson, R. L.

Importance of Bone Attenuation in Brain SPECT Quantification

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Magnetic Resonance, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Lawson Research Institute, and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Frank S. Prato, PhD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Centre, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of nonuniform attenuation on relative quantification in brain SPECT and to compare the ability of the Chang and Sorenson uniform attenuation corrections (UACs) to achieve volumetric relative quantification. Methods: Three head phantoms (dry human skull, Rando and Radiology Support Devices (RSD) phantoms) were compared with a human head using a gamma camera transmission CT (TCT) SPECT system and x-ray CT. Subsequently, the RSD phantom's brain reservoir was filled with a uniform water solution of ^99mTc, and SPECT and TCT data were acquired using fanbeam collimation. The attenuating effects of bone, scalp and head-holder in individual projections were determined by an analytical projection technique using the SPECT and TCT reconstructions. The Chang UAC used brain and head contours that were segmented from the TCT reconstruction to demarcate its attenuation map, whereas the Sorenson UAC fit slice-specific ellipses to the SPECT projection data. For each UAC, volumetric relative quantification was measured with varying attenuation coefficients (µs) of the attenuation map. Results: Gamma camera transmission CT and x-ray CT scans showed that the dry skull and Rando phantoms suffered from a dried trabecular bone compartment. The RSD phantom most closely reproduced the attenuation coefficients of the human TCT and x-ray CT scans. The analytical projections showed that the attenuating effects of bone, scalp and head-holder were nonuniform across the projections and accounted for 18%–37% of the total count loss. Volumetric relative quantification was best achieved with the Chang (zero iterations) attenuation correction using the head contour and µ = 0.075 cm^–1; however, cortical activity was found to be 10% higher than cerebellar activity. For all UACs, the optimal choices of µ were experimentally found to be lower than the recommended 0.12 cm^–1 for brain tissue. This result is theoretically supported here. Conclusion: The magnitude of errors resulting from uniform attenuation corrections can be greater than the magnitudes of regional cerebral blood flow deficits in patients with dementia, as compared with normal controls. This suggests that nonuniform attenuation correction in brain SPECT imaging must be applied to accurately estimate regional cerebral blood flow.

Key Words: brain SPECT attenuation • head phantom • Chang attenuation correction • Sorenson attenuation correction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hayashi, J. Deguchi, K. Utsunomiya, M. Yamada, T. Komori, M. Takeuchi, K. Kanna, and I. Narabayashi Comparison of Methods of Attenuation and Scatter Correction in Brain Perfusion SPECT J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2005; 33(4): 224 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Zaidi and B. Hasegawa Determination of the Attenuation Map in Emission Tomography J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 291 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. K. Leong, R. L. Kruger, and M. K. O'Connor A Comparison of the Uniformity Requirements for SPECT Image Reconstruction Using FBP and OSEM Techniques J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2001; 29(2): 79 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Van Laere, M. Koole, T. Kauppinen, M. Monsieurs, L. Bouwens, and R. Dierck Nonuniform Transmission in Brain SPECT Using 201Tl, 153Gd, and 99mTc Static Line Sources: Anthropomorphic Dosimetry Studies and Influence on Brain Quantification J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2000; 41(12): 2051 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]