HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Azarian, R. Articles by Simonneau, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Azarian, R. Articles by Simonneau, G.

Lung Perfusion Scans and Hemodynamics in Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism

Departments of Pneumology and Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France; Departments of Pneumology and Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Laënnec, Paris, France

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Gerald Simonneau, MD, Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92 141 Clamart Cedex, France.

ABSTRACT

To assess the relationship between pulmonary vascular obstruction and hemodynamic status in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), perfusion lung scan and hemodynamic measurements were obtained in 31 consecutive patients with APE and in 45 with CTEPH. Methods: Lung scans were scored independently by two experienced observers who determined the percentage of vascular obstruction (PVOs). Mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and total pulmonary resistance (TPR) were obtained during right heart catheterization. In patients with APE, measurements were recorded within a 1-hr interval before and 12 hours after thrombolysis. This yielded 62 paired PVOs values with concomitant PAP and TPR measurements. In patients with CTEPH, data were recorded within a 3-day interval. Results: Mean PVOs (%) values were similar in APE and CTEPH patients (59 ± 13 vs. 58 ± 15), whereas PAP and TPR were significantly higher in CTEPH patients (51 ± 17 mmHg and 23 ± 11 U/m², respectively) than in APE patients (23 ± 8 mmHg and 9 ± 5 U/m², respectively, p < 0.001). In APE patients, significant hyperbolic correlations were found linking PVOs with PAP and TPR (r = 0.75, p < 0.01 for PAP; r = 0.71, p < 0.01 for TPR). In CTEPH, there were no significant correlations between PVOs and PAP or TPR. For the same level of PVOs, patients with CTEPH had higher PAP and TPR values than patients with APE. Conclusion: In APE without prior cardiopulmonary disease, increases in PAP and TPR are correlated in a nonlinear fashion with the degree of pulmonary vascular obstruction as assessed by lung scanning. In CTEPH patients, the higher PAP and TPR values as compared to APE patients with comparable degrees of PVOs are consistent with previous reports that pulmonary hypertension in CTEPH is due not only to the obstruction of proximal pulmonary arteries but also to remodeling of small distal arteries in nonoccluded areas.

Key Words: pulmonary hypertension • thromboendarterectomy • pulmonary artery pressure • pulmonary embolism

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Galie and N. H. S. Kim Pulmonary Microvascular Disease in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Proceedings of the ATS, September 1, 2006; 3(7): 571 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Peacock, G. Simonneau, and L. Rubin Controversies, Uncertainties and Future Research on the Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Proceedings of the ATS, September 1, 2006; 3(7): 608 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Hoeper, E. Mayer, G. Simonneau, and L. J. Rubin Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Circulation, April 25, 2006; 113(16): 2011 - 2020. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Thistlethwaite, A. Kemp, L. Du, M. M. Madani, and S. W. Jamieson Outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy for treatment of extreme thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2006; 131(2): 307 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Rubin and D. B. Badesch Evaluation and Management of the Patient with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2005; 143(4): 282 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. McGoon, D. Gutterman, V. Steen, R. Barst, D. C. McCrory, T. A. Fortin, and J. E. Loyd Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1_suppl): 14S - 34S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Dartevelle, E. Fadel, S. Mussot, A. Chapelier, P. Herve, M. de Perrot, J. Cerrina, F.L. Ladurie, D. Lehouerou, M. Humbert, et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 637 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Scott Pulmonary Perfusion Patterns and Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 513 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2000; 21(16): 1301 - 1336. [PDF]

				H. Imanaka, H. Miyano, M. Takeuchi, K. Kumon, and M. Ando Effects of Nitric Oxide Inhalation After Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy for Chronic Pulmonary Thromboembolism Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 39 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]