JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 38 No. 5 785-790
© 1997 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, W.D.
Right arrow Articles by Peterdy, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, W.D.
Right arrow Articles by Peterdy, A. E.

Comparison of Motion Correction Algorithms for Cardiac SPECT

W.D. Leslie, Jacqueline O. Dupont, Donna McDonald and Anne E. Peterdy

Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: W.D. Leslie, Department of Intemal Medicine (C5121), St. Boniface General Hospital, 409 Tache Ave., Winnipeg, Canada R2H 2A6.

ABSTRACT

Patient motion remains a significant source of unsatisfactory cardiac SPECT examinations. The extent to which image recovery can be achieved with correction algorithms is unknown. Methods: Nine subjects who had completed motion-free redistribution 201Tl cardiac SPECT subsequently underwent simultaneous dual-isotope (201Tl/99mTc) SPECT wtth a 99mTc cutaneous point source, while the imaging table was subjected to predefined nonreturning y-translation movements. Cardiac reconstructions, marker reconstructions and marker-compressed dynamic images were generated from the raw data after applying the following correction methods: diverging squares, cross-correlation of the cardiac data and cross-correlation of the marker. Results: Marker cross-correlation performed significantly better than all other methods with good-excellent results in all evaluations. This compared with good-excellent results in none of 27 for the raw data, in 13 of 27 for cardiac cross-correlation and in 7 of 27 for diverging squares (p < 10–5). The superiority of the marker-based method was confirmed on analysis of bullseye difference maps and quantitation of residual motion in the point-source data. Conclusion: Motion artifacts can accurately be detected and corrected using cross-correlation of an external point-source. Furthermore, this technique provides useful independent information on the degree of image recovery.

Key Words: thallium-201 • SPECT • motion artifacts • myocardial perfusion




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
N. Matsumoto, D. S. Berman, P. B. Kavanagh, J. Gerlach, S. W. Hayes, H. C. Lewin, J. D. Friedman, and G. Germano
Quantitative Assessment of Motion Artifacts and Validation of a New Motion-Correction Program for Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2001; 42(5): 687 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.