JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 38 No. 5 760-765
© 1997 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puskás, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schober, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puskás, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schober, O.

Progressive Heterogeneity of Myocardial Perfusion in Heart Transplant Recipients Detected by Thallium-201 Myocardial SPECT

Cornelia Puskás, Markus Kosch, Sebastian Kerber, Margot Jonas, Michael Weyand, Günter Breithardt, Hans H. Scheld and Otmar Schober

Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiology and Angiology, and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wesfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Cornelia Puskás, Department of Medicine and Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Of Westfalische Wilhelms-University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer Str. 33, 48129 Münster, Germany.

ABSTRACT

Progressive graft atherosclerosisis a serious complication in long term survivors after heart transplantation. Coronary angiography is insensitive with regard to the early and characteristic alterations. We evaluated the progression of these abnormalities and the influence of former rejection episodes. Methods: Early after transplantation, 43 patients (34 men, mean age 53.7 ± 10.7 yr) underwent stress and redistribution 201Tl myocardial SPECT after treadmill exercise. Twenty patients were followed-up to the second postoperative year, and 13 patients to the third postoperative year. Thallium-201 distribution and kinetic abnormalities were documented in a scheme enclosing 20 myocardial segments. Additionally, a score was developed that measured the degree of inhomogeneity of 201Tl distribution and the severity of perfusion defects, respectively. Results: Regarding scintigraphy, pathologic results could be found in 40% of segments (redistribution, 25%; reverse redistribution, 30%; persistent defects, 49%). Score values in heart transplant recipients differed significantly from normal controls (p < 0.001) and were comparable to patients with single vessel disease of their native hearts. Thallium-201 inhomogeneity in recipients after treatable rejection episodes did not differ from results in recipients without any biopsy-proven rejection. The follow-up of cardiac transplant patients revealed a significant increase of score values up to the third year after transplantation (p < 0.02), despite reproducible normal angiography. There was no direct correlation between score values and IVUS results, although there was a parallel trend in 10 of 12 follow-ups. Conclusion: Despite normal coronary angiography, 201Tl myocardial SPECT frequently revealed pathologic results in heart transplant recipients. Scintigraphic results did not correlate with intimal thickening of epicardial coronary arteries accessible to intravascular ultrasonography in the early phase after transplantation. The presented score of inhomogeneity might reveal progressive disease possibly caused by small vessel alterations.

Key Words: coronary artery disease • thallium-201 • SPECT • heart transplantation • graft atherosclerosis • intravascular ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
V. A. Roelants, J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde, T. M. Vander Borght, and J. A. Melin
Reverse Redistribution on Exercise-Redistribution 201Tl SPECT in Chronic Ischemic Dysfunction: Predictive of Functional Outcome After Revascularization?
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.