JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 38 No. 5 723-726
© 1997 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salako, Q. A.
Right arrow Articles by DeNardo, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salako, Q. A.
Right arrow Articles by DeNardo, S. J.

Radioassay of Yttrium-90 Radiation Using the Radionuclide Dose Calibrator

Qansy A. Salako and Sally J. DeNardo

Molecular Cancer Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Qansy Salako, PhD, Molecular Cancer Institute, 1508, Alhmabra Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95816.

ABSTRACT

Yttrium-90 is used in radioimmunotherapy because of its favorable physical half-life and energetic pure beta emissions. However, it is often necessary to standardize 90Y sources to establish a dose calibrator dial setting for accurate calibration of clinical doses of 90Y reparations. Methods: A solution of 90YCI3 containing 2.81 kBq/ml (by supplier's calibration) was prepared by serial dilution in 0.05 M HCI. Ten 100-µl aliquots of this solution were counted in a Packard liquid scinlillation analyzer; the mean radioactivity in becquerals cwas determined and used to evaluate dial settings 48 x 10,775 x 70 and 775 x 100 on a radionuclide dose calibrator for 90Y measurements. The dose calibrator response was also studied on sources at varying solution volumes in plastic and glass containers. Results: Calibrator readings of 90Y sources in glass and plastic vials and plastic syringes were accurate at aither dial sethng 48 x 10 (commonly used by many 90Y laboratories) or 775 x 70. Measurements of 1.15 and 3.03 GBq (31 and 82 mCi, respectively) calibrated 90Y sources in either vial were –3.0 and +4.3%, respectively, at dial-setting 775 x 70 and –4.0 and +9.0% at 48 x 10. Yttrium-90 sources in plastic syringes gave higher readings than those in glass vials, therefore, requiring a container correction factor for accurate dose assay. Measurements of 90YCI3 shipments from four suppliers over a 3-yr period demonstrated concurring calibration measurements at both 775 x 70 and 48 x 10 settings for shipments from all suppliers. The dose calibrator response to 90Y radiation was linear within a 1–333 kBq range in a constant sampiS volume of 580 µl. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the validity of using the 48 x 10 dial-factor combinationon the standard radionuclide dose calibrator for calibration of 90Y radiopharmaceuticals.

Key Words: yttrium-90 • dose calibrator • assay • liquid scintillation • linearity test







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.