JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 37 No. 4 577-581
© 1996 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gottschalk, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gottschalk, A.

Evaluation of Individual Criteria for Low Probability Interpretation of Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scans

Paul D. Stein , Bruce Relyea and Alexander Gottschalk

Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, Michigan
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Paul D. Stein, MD, Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, New Center Pavilion, Room 1107, 2921 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202-2691.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to identify characteristics or combinations of characteristics of the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) that can be used for a "very low probability" interpretation (<10% positive predictive value). Methods: Data were culled from individual lungs of 532 patients in the randomized arm of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) study and 205 patients in the referred arm. All patients had a <20% consensus probability estimate of PE based on V/Q scan results, and all underwent pulmonary angiography. Results: Nonsegmental perfusion abnormalities, perfusion defects smaller than opacities on the chest radiograph, a combination of these types of perfusion abnormalities, and matched V/Q abnormalities in two or three zones of a single lung had a positive predictive value < 10%. These criteria can therefore be used for a very low probability interpretation. A matched V/Q defect in only one zone of the lung had a positive predictive value greater than 10% and is not a criterion for very low probability classification but can be considered a criterion for low probability. Perfusion defects associated with small pleural effusions (obliteration of the costophrenic angle) had a positive predictive value of 25%–33%, depending on the group studied, and are a criterion for intermediate probability. Conclusion: Criteria appropriate for very low probability (<10% positive predictive value) interpretation of V/Q scans in patients with suspected acute PE have been identified.

Key Words: pulmonary embolism • thromboembolism • ventilation-perfusion lung scans




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J. Burrill, Z. Dabbagh, F. Gollub, and M. Hamady
Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2007; 83(985): 698 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Gottschalk, P. D. Stein, H. D. Sostman, F. Matta, and A. Beemath
Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED II
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1411 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
U. J. Schoepf, S. Z. Goldhaber, and P. Costello
Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2160 - 2167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R G McLean, M Carolan, C Bui, O Arvela, J C Ford, M Chew, S Wadhwa, and B S Elison
Comparison of new clinical and scintigraphic algorithms for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2004; 77(917): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf and P. Costello
CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: State of the Art
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 329 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. A. Meignan
Lung Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT: The Right Technique for Hard Times
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 648 - 651.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. D. Stein and A. Gottschalk
Review of Criteria Appropriate for a Very Low Probability of Pulmonary Embolism on Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scans: A Position Paper
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.