JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 37 No. 3 406-410
© 1996 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vernet, O.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vernet, O.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, J. L.

Radionuclide Shuntogram: Adjunct to Manage Hydrocephalic Patients

Olivier Vernet, Jean-Pierre Farmer, Raymond Lambert and José L. Montes

Departments of Neurosurgery and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Jean-Pierre Farmer, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, 2300 Tupper Str., Room C-811, Montreal, Quebec H3H 1P3 Canada.

ABSTRACT

We reviewed our experience with shuntograms to establish technical criteria that would optimize the reliability of this test in managing patients with shunt malfunction. Methods: Fifty-six shuntograms were performed in 47 children presenting with symptoms of shunt malfunction not elucidated by conventional radiological examination. Shuntograms were performed by injecting 0.5 ml 99mTc-DTPA in the reservoir of the shunt. Results: There were 22 shuntograms in which ventricular reflux occurred and the entire shunt system was visualized. At surgery, three patients in this group presented partial obstruction of the ventricular and/or peritoneal catheter. A second group of patients had 15 shuntograms that showed normal proximal reflux but abnormal distal drainage. Ten patients in this group presented distal obstruction or fracture, valve dysfunction or peritoneal adhesions at surgery. A third group of patients with 19 shuntograms exhibited no proximal reflux. At surgery, twelve had an obstructed ventricular catheter and the last case showed overdrainage. Symptoms of nonsurgical patients abated spontaneously. Conclusion: The shuntogram is a useful procedure in the management of patients presenting with shunt-related problems. For consideration as a normal result, a shuntogram must exhibit ventricular reflux, the shunt system must be entirely visualized and the isotope must diffuse uniformly in the peritoneal cavity. Whereas rapid radionuclide clearance is a useful parameter in eliminating a distal obstruction, it is a misleading sign for proximal blockage. Absence of ventricular reflux is highly suggestive of proximal reflux. Implicit to this conclusion is the fact that the presence of a reservoir proximal to the valve greatly facilitates the performance and interpretation of a shuntogram.

Key Words: shuntogram • cerebrospinal fluid shunt • shunt malfunction • hydrocephalus







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.