JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 37 No. 10 1649-1652
© 1996 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mousa, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mousa, D.

Interpretation of Captopril Transplant Renography Using a Feed Forward Neural Network

David Hamilton, Ueber J. Miola and Dujana Mousa

Departments of Medical Physics, Clinical and Bio-Engineering and Renal Medicine, Armed Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: David Hamilton, PhD, Military Hospital, P.O. Box 7897/X990, Riyadh 11159, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

ABSTRACT

Severe renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a relatively uncommon complication after renal transplantation but is a curable cause of hypertension, which demands reliable early diagnosis to reduce morbidity, mortality and graft loss. Captopril renography has been used for a number of years as a method of detecting RAS but controversy still exists as to the diagnostic accuracy of this test and as to the most appropriate interpretation criteria with which to establish a positive result. Methods: This report presents the results of using artificial neural networks to impartially assess these interpretation criteria. Data comprised 31 99mTc-MAG3 captopril renography investigations undertaken on hypertensive renal transplant patients with a suspected diagnosis of RAS. Each renogram study was correlated with an arteriogram as the "gold standard". Training of the network was performed using the round-robin technique. Results: An accuracy of 95% could be achieved by considering perfusion index, time-to-peak activity, accumulation index and excretion index for both pre- and post-challenge studies. This varied as the parameters were either included or excluded. Conclusion: Artificial neural network analysis is a useful technique to evaluate the most appropriate criteria for interpreting captopril transplant renography investigations.

Key Words: neural network • captopril • renography • transplant • MAG3







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.