|
|
||||||||
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan and Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, Michigan
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Alexander Gottschalk, MD, Michigan State University, B220 Clin. Science Bldg., East Lansing, MI 48224.
ABSTRACT
This investigation assessed the positive predictive value of matched ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) and chest radiographic defects (triple-matched defects) for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: Data are from the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). Only patients randomized for obligatory pulmonary angiography were included. Lungs were excluded if they showed any mismatched V/Q defect or any pleural effusion. Results: Positive predictive values of triple-matched defects in the upper plus middle zones, 1 of 27 (4%), were less frequent than in the lower zones, 13 of 57 (23%) (p < 0.05). Triple-matched defects that involved 2550% of a zone showed PE in 12 of 38 (32%) which was a higher positive predictive value than with smaller or larger triple-matched defects, 2 of 46 (4%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Refinement of the PIOPED data by elimination of nonrandomized patients, elimination of lungs with mismatched perfusion defects and elimination of lungs with a pleural effusion indicate that triple matches with PE (radiographic pulmonary infarcts) are infrequent in the upper and middle lung zones. When a triple match with PE occurs, it is most likely to be 2550% of a zone.
Key Words: pulmonary embolism thromboembolism pulmonary scintiscans ventilaton/perfusion lung scans
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, A. Gottschalk, F. Matta, R. Hull, and L. Goodman Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in PIOPED II Study Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 941 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gottschalk, P. D. Stein, H. D. Sostman, F. Matta, and A. Beemath Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED II J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1411 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Harris, D. Bailey, S. Miles, E. Bailey, K. Rogers, P. Roach, P. Thomas, M. Hensley, and G. G. King Objective Analysis of Tomographic Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2007; 175(11): 1173 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R G McLean, M Carolan, C Bui, O Arvela, J C Ford, M Chew, S Wadhwa, and B S Elison Comparison of new clinical and scintigraphic algorithms for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2004; 77(917): 372 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Stein and A. Gottschalk Review of Criteria Appropriate for a Very Low Probability of Pulmonary Embolism on Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scans: A Position Paper RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 99 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |