JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 37 No. 10 1618-1621
© 1996 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Better, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gervino, E. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Better, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gervino, E. V.

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy: Effect on Diagnostic and Clinical Management Algorithms

Nathan Better, J. Anthony Parker, Thomas P. Rocco, Michael Simons and Ernesto V. Gervino

Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiology, Beth Israel Hospital
Department of Cardiology, West Roxbury, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: M. Simons, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.

ABSTRACT

Research has demonstrated that myocardial perfusion imaging increases the sensitivity and specificity of stress electrocardiography. However, the additional effect of the perfusion component of a stress study on clinical management algorithms remains poorly defined. Methods: We prospectively assessed the decision-making process in 518 patients, from 191 clinicians, undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging in our departments. Each clinician was asked, by telephone interview, to define the probability of reversible myocardial ischemia and their management plan (i.e., no antianginal treatment, medical therapy or an invasive intervention) in three stages: pretest, after the stress data was made available and after completion of the perfusion study. Results: The results of the stress data alone influenced the estimate of the probability of reversible ischemia in 149 of 518 patients, and management strategy in 50 of 518 patients. The data from the perfusion component in isolation changed probability of reversible disease in 219 of 518 patients and altered clinical management in 77 of 518 patients. Of 103 patients in whom an invasive procedure was planned after the stress data, the availability of the perfusion data led to deferral of catheterization in 48 cases (46.6%). Conversely, of the 415 patients triaged to a noninvasive plan after stress data, only 29 (7.0%) were changed to an invasive strategy. Of note, only 2.3% of women changed from a conservative strategy as a consequence of the perfusion data, compared to 9.1% of men. Conclusion: The perfusion component of a stress study has a significant effect on both estimation of clinical probability and the definition of patient management strategy. Myocardial perfusion imaging reduced the number of catheterizations in patients initially triaged to an invasive management strategy. Conversely, the effect of stress and perfusion data in patients triaged to conservative management on clinical grounds, especially women, remains less well defined.

Key Words: myocardial perfusion imaging • management • probability of reversible myocardial ischemia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.