JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 37 No. 1 38-41
© 1996 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Klerk, J. M.H.
Right arrow Articles by van Rijk, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Klerk, J. M.H.
Right arrow Articles by van Rijk, P. P.

Bone Marrow Absorbed Dose of Rhenium-186-HEDP and the Relationship with Decreased Platelet Counts

John M.H. de Klerk, Erik B. van Dieren, Alfred D. van het Schip, Anne Hoekstra, Bernard A. Zonnenberg, Aalt van Dijk, Derk H. Rutgers, Geert H. Blijham and Peter P. van Rijk

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Hospital Pharmacy and Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: J.M.H. de Klerk, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, Room E02.222, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

ABSTRACT

Rhenium-186(Sn)-1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (186Re-HEDP) has been used for palliation of metastatic bone pain. The purpose of this study was to find a relationship between the bone marrow absorbed dose and the toxicity, expressed as the percentage decrease in the peripheral blood platelet count. Methods: The bone marrow absorbed dose was calculated according to the MIRD model using data obtained from ten treatments of patients suffering from metastatic prostate cancer; noninvasive and pharmacokinetic methods were used. The bone marrow doses were related to toxicity using the pharmacodynamic sigmoid Emax model. Results: The mean bone marrow absorbed doses using the noninvasive and pharmacokinetic methods were in a close range to each other (1.07 mGy/MBq and 1.02 mGy/MBq, respectively). There was a good relationship between the toxicity and the bone marrow absorbed dose (r = 0.80). Furthermore, the EDrm50 (i.e., the bone marrow absorbed dose producing a 50% platelet decrease) to bone marrow for 186Re-HEDP was on the order of 2 Gy. Conclusion: Although the function of normal bone marrow is affected by metastases in patients with metastatic bone disease, the MIRD model can be used to relate toxicity to the bone marrow absorbed dose after a therapeutic dosage of 186Re-HEDP.

Key Words: bone metastases • rhenium-186-HEDP • dosimetry • toxicity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.