|
|
||||||||
Department of Internal Medicine and Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Barry L. Shulkin, MD, Pediatric Nuclear Medicine, MCHC F3313, University of Michigan Medical Center, 200 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0229.
ABSTRACT
The goals of this investigation were to characterize the uptake of 11C-hydroxyephedrine (HED) in neuroblastoma and to determine the feasibility and potential advantages of utilizing this compound as a tumor imaging agent. Methods: Seven patients with known or subsequently proven neuroblastoma were studied. Each patient underwent PET scanning with 11C-HED. Six of seven patients underwent scintigraphy with [123I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), and two patients were also studied with [18F]FDG PET. For six patients, CT or MR images were available for comparison. Results: Neuroblastomas were located by PET scanning with 11C-HED in all seven patients. The uptake of HED into neuroblastomas was rapid; tumors were evident on images within 5 min postintravenous injection. Those lesions in the field of view of the PET camera were also identified on [123I]MIBG scintigraphic images. In two patients, tumor deposits in the abdomen were better visualized with MIBG scintigraphy due to relatively less hepatic accumulation of MIBG than HED. Conclusion: PET scanning with HED for neuroblastoma results in high quality functional images of the tumors that can be obtained within minutes following injection.
Key Words: PET neuroblastoma carbon-11-HED iodine-123-MIBG fluorine-18-FDG
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Moroz, I. Serganova, P. Zanzonico, L. Ageyeva, T. Beresten, E. Dyomina, E. Burnazi, R. D. Finn, M. Doubrovin, and R. G. Blasberg Imaging hNET Reporter Gene Expression with 124I-MIBG J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 827 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Franzius, K. Hermann, M. Weckesser, K. Kopka, K. U. Juergens, J. Vormoor, and O. Schober Whole-Body PET/CT with 11C-Meta-Hydroxyephedrine in Tumors of the Sympathetic Nervous System: Feasibility Study and Comparison with 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1635 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Mann, J. M. Link, P. Pham, C. A. Pickett, D. R. Byrd, P. E. Kinahan, K. A. Krohn, and D. A. Mankoff [11C]Metahydroxyephedrine and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Improve Clinical Decision Making in Suspected Pheochromocytoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 187 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Buursma, A. M.J. Beerens, E. F.J. de Vries, A. van Waarde, M. G. Rots, G. A.P. Hospers, W. Vaalburg, and H. J. Haisma The Human Norepinephrine Transporter in Combination with 11C-m-Hydroxyephedrine as a Reporter Gene/Reporter Probe for PET of Gene Therapy J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2068 - 2075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pacak, G. Eisenhofer, and D. S. Goldstein Functional Imaging of Endocrine Tumors: Role of Positron Emission Tomography Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 568 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Kushner Neuroblastoma: A Disease Requiring a Multitude of Imaging Studies J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1172 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Roberts and B. L. Shulkin Technical Issues in Performing PET Studies in Pediatric Patients J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2004; 32(1): 5 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Trampal, H. Engler, C. Juhlin, M. Bergstrom, and B. Langstrom Pheochromocytomas: Detection with 11C Hydroxyephedrine PET Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 423 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Kushner, H. W.D. Yeung, S. M. Larson, K. Kramer, and N.-K. V. Cheung Extending Positron Emission Tomography Scan Utility to High-Risk Neuroblastoma: Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography as Sole Imaging Modality in Follow-Up of Patients J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2001; 19(14): 3397 - 3405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |