JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 36 No. 8 1363-1367
© 1995 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhargava, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhargava, D. K.

Effect of Endoscopic Variceal Sclerotherapy on Esophageal Motor Functions and Gastroesophageal Reflux

Sandeep S. Sidhu, Chandrasekhar Bal, Prasanta Karak, Pramod K. Garg and Dinesh K. Bhargava

Departments of Gastroenterology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: D.K. Bhargava, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar New Delhi 110029, India.

ABSTRACT

Sclerotherapy results in significant local complications, both immediate and delayed. This study was designed to examine the esophageal pathophysiology underlying these complications. Methods: We prospectively evaluated esophageal transit, motility abnormalities and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with barium studies and esophageal functional scintigraphy in 24 patients (20 men, 4 women; mean age 33 ± 12.4 yr) before sclerotherapy (Phase I), after two sessions (Phase II), following variceal eradication (Phase III) and 4 wk later (Phase IV). Results: Varices were obliterated after 5.6 ± 1.9 sessions of intravariceal sclerotherapy performed weekly with 1% polidocanol (17.3 ml per session). There was no baseline Phase I dysmotility or reflux. Phase II studies recorded a marked delay of esophageal global and segmental (mid and distal) transit time in 98.2% of patients by scintigraphy and 90% by barium studies. Incoordinate contractions and aperistalsis were observed in 0, 66.7%, 58.3% and 33.8% of patients from Phases I–V studies, respectively. Barium studies revealed tertiary waves and reverse peristalsis in 0, 50%, and 75% of patients from Phases I–III; strictures were observed in 0, 1, and 3 patients during Phases I–III. GER was detected scintigraphically in 0, 58.3%, 25% and 16.6% during Phases I–IV sequentially. In contrast, barium studies grossly underestimated GER (0, 5% and 15% at phases I–III). Conclusion: There was strong concordance between esophageal symptoms, transit, motility abnormalities and GER (p < 0.05). Variceal eradication (Phases III and IV) was associated with a gradual recovery of esophageal symptoms, ulcers and all abnormal scintigraphic parameters. Sclerosant-induced chemical esophagitis in association with peptic esophagitis due to gross reflux following sclerotherapy possibly can explain the symptoms in most patients.

Key Words: variceal sclerotherapy • esophageal motor functioning • gastroesophageal reflux • barium studies







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.