JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 36 No. 3 364-368
© 1995 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S. Z.

Lung Scan Evaluation of Thrombolytic Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism

J. Anthony Parker, David E. Drum, Michael L. Feldstein and Samuel Z. Goldhaber

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Frontier Science and Technology, Brookline, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: J. Anthony Parker, MD, PhD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.

ABSTRACT

Data from three trials of thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism (PE) were combined to assess the utility of perfusion lung scan defect scoring in predicting the response to thrombolytic therapy. Methods: Pre-and post-therapy lung scans and duration of symptoms were available for a total of 221 patients, 167 were treated with various thrombolytic regimes and 54 were treated with heparin alone. Results: Improvement in the lung scan defect score was correlated with larger initial defect score (r = 0.53), segmental appearance (r = 0.31) and shorter duration of symptoms (r = 0.20). There was no significant residual correlation between improvement and segmental appearance in a multiple regression analysis after accounting for initial defect score and duration of symptoms. Two lung scan scoring methods (segmental and anterior-posterior method) provided similar results with low interobserver variability (r = 0.90 for both methods). Conclusion: This study indicates that the baseline perfusion lung scan defect severity helps to predict the response to thrombolytic therapy.

Key Words: pulmonary embolism • lung • radionuclide studies • thrombolysis • thrombolytic therapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
S. Z Goldhaber
A contemporary approach to thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2000; 5(2): 115 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.