|
|
||||||||
Department of Neurology, Graduate Hospital
Department of Radiology and Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Dr. Mark M. Stecker, Dept. of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
ABSTRACT
In this paper we correlate the findings on 99mTc-HMPAO brain SPECT with the results of clinical examinations and electroencephalography to determine the utility of SPECT in the evaluation of patients with suspected status epilepticus. Methods: Thirteen patients with suspected status epilepticus underwent serial neurologic examinations, serial electroencephalograms, CT/MRI scanning and 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT. Seven patients were diagnosed with status epilepticus and six patients received other neurological diagnoses. Results: All patients with status epilepticus at the time of the brain SPECT scan demonstrated focal hyperperfusion on SPECT in an area concordant with that suggested by EEG. One patient with status epilepticus demonstrated a persistent area of hyperperfusion on SPECT 24 hr after the cessation of status with no evidence of breakdown in the blood-brain barrier demonstrated by 99mTc-DTPA SPECT. No patient in this study without a diagnosis of status epilepticus had focal areas of hyperperfusion on SPECT. Conclusion: We suggest that a 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT scan demonstrating focal hyperperfusion in a patient being evaluated for partial status epilepticus is nonspecific. Even in the absence of a structural lesion causing local breakdown in the blood-brain barrier, it may indicate either ongoing status epilepticus or recently terminated status. However, a SPECT scan demonstrating no area of focal hyperperfusion argues against the diagnosis of partial status.
Key Words: partial status epilepticus technetium-99m HMPAO brain SPECT electroencephalography
FOOTNOTES
* Current Address: Department of Neurology, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Castellino, M. Padovan, A. Bortoluzzi, M. Borrelli, L. Feggi, M. L. Caniatti, F. Trotta, and M. Govoni Single photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation in SLE patients with and without neuropsychiatric involvement Rheumatology, March 1, 2008; 47(3): 319 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Castellino, M Govoni, M Padovan, P Colamussi, M Borrelli, and F Trotta Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy may predict future brain lesions in SLE patients: a functional multi-imaging approach and follow up Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2005; 64(7): 1022 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Kapucu, A. Serdaroglu, C. Okuyaz, G. Kose, and K. Gucuyener Brain Single Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Patients With Childhood Absence Epilepsy J Child Neurol, August 1, 2003; 18(8): 542 - 548. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Benbadis, W. O. Tatum IV, A. R. Towne, E. J. Waterhouse, and L. Garnett Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients Neurology, November 14, 2000; 55(9): 1421 - 1423. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |