JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 35 No. 5 876-881
© 1994 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by John, E.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by John, E.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A.L.

Technetium-99m-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies: Influence of Technetium-99m Binding Sites

E. John, M.L. Thakur, S. Wilder, M.M. Alauddin and A.L. Epstein

Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: M.L. Thakur PhD, Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

ABSTRACT

A number of 99mTc-labeled monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) are being evaluated for diagnostic applications. Preparations are carried out using both direct and indirect(bifunctional chelating agent, BFCA) labeling procedures in which nonspecific 99mTc binding has been postulated. Methods: By using the ascorbic acid (AA) reduction mediated direct labeling procedure and diaminotetrathiol (N2S4) as a BFCA method, we examined the role of specific binding sites and aliphatic E amino groups of lysine as nonspecific binding sites for 99mTc. Results: Labeling yields for the direct and N2S4 "regular" preparations averaged 73% ± 2.8% and 91% ± 2%, for the "specific" preparations, 60% ± 3.5% and 75% ± 2% and for the "nonspecific" preparations 13% ± 1.0% and 16% ± 1% respectively. All preparations were evaluated in tumor-bearing mice. The control and specific preparations permitted excellent scintigraphic visualization of tumors; the percentages of specific preparations in the tumors being 2.1% ± 0.5% and 3.1% ± 0.4%, respectively. With nonspecific preparations, tumors were not visualized and the percentages of administered radioactivity per gram of tumor were only 0.9% ± 0.2% and 0.9% ± 0.3%, respectively. Conclusions: In these 99mTc labeling procedures, the amino group-mediated nonspecific binding of 99mTc to Mabs can be as high as 16% and contributes to increased liver uptake and decreased tumor uptake of radioactivity.

Key Words: technetium-99m-labeled monoclonal antibodies • technetium-99m binding sites • FITC blocking • iodoacetate blocking







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.