JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 35 No. 12 1928-1931
© 1994 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, R. J.

Incidence of Pulmonary Embolism in Single Segmental Mismatch on Lung Scanning

Elizabeth J. Bernard, Ramy Nour, S. Patrick Butler and Richard J. Quinn

Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Dr. R. J. Quinn, Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. George Hospital, Belgrave Street, Kogarah N.S.W. 2217, Australia.

ABSTRACT

Controversy exists as to whether patients with single segmental mismatch (SSM) on a ventilation/perfusion (VQ) lung scan should be given a low or an intermediate probability of pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: Pulmonary angiography was used to evaluate the incidence of PE in SSM at the authors' institution. From January 1991 to January 1993, 1449 VQ scans were performed. Results: With modified Biello criteria, 283 were high probability; 628, low probability; 273, normal; and 273, intermediate probability. Of the intermediate probability scans, 61 had SSM. Forty of these patients underwent pulmonary angiography. Twelve patients had PE in the area of the SSM, giving an incidence of PE of 30%. The risk of PE in SSM in the different lung regions was also analyzed. Twenty-three SSM were in the bases of the lung with a 22% incidence of PE; 17 SSM were either in the midzone or apex with a 41% incidence of PE (p = not significant). Conclusion: SSM carries a 30% risk of PE. Accordingly, SSM should be given an intermediate probability of PE and not a low probability of PE.

Key Words: single segmental mismatch • ventilation-perfusion scan • pulmonary embolism







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.