HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yu, J.N. Articles by Keyes, J.W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yu, J.N. Articles by Keyes, J.W., Jr.

Evaluation of Emission-Transmission Registration in Thoracic PET

PET Center, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Frederic H. Fahey, DSc, PET Center, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1061.

ABSTRACT

The intent of this investigation was to quantitate the amount of misregistration between PET emission and transmission scans of the thorax that occurs in a normal clinical environment. Methods: The data from 17 FDG myocardial studies were evaluated. Prior to injection, a transmission study was acquired for 15 min using a ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga ring source. The location of the cross-hairs from a laser alignment system was marked on the patient who was then removed from the scanner and injected with 10 mCi of FDG. After 45 min, the patient was placed back on the table and repositioned with the previously placed marks and a 15-min emission scan was acquired. The outline of the lungs on both the transmission and emission images was manually segmented. Both attenuation-corrected and noncorrected emission images were evaluated and the one that provided clearer visualization of the outline of the lungs was chosen for segmentation. The segmented contours of the transmission and emission scans were then registered with the method described by Pelizzari et al. using the transmission image as the "head" and the emission image as the "hat." The allowable transformations were x and y shifts and rotation in the transverse plane. Results: Shifts in the x-axis averaged 2.4 mm (range: 0.2–7.3 mm, 80% less than 3.3 mm) with shifts in the y-axis averaging 2.6 mm (range: 0.1–8.7 mm, 80% less than 2.4 mm) and rotations in the transverse plane averaging 1.6 degrees (range: 0.2 to 5.1 degrees, 80% less than 2.4 degrees). A phantom study indicated that the accuracy of this method of evaluating misregistration was 2.35 mm and 1.81 mm in the x and y directions, respectively. Conclusion: Our preliminary evaluation indicates that careful application of laser alignment is an adequate method of registration in most cases.

Key Words: thoracic PET • image registration

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, A. Guha, and S. Sdringola Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1112 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Loghin, S. Sdringola, and K. L. Gould Common Artifacts in PET Myocardial Perfusion Images Due to Attenuation-Emission Misregistration: Clinical Significance, Causes, and Solutions J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]