|
|
||||||||
Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Val J. Lowe, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, St. Louis University Medical Center, 3635 Vista Ave. at Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110-0250.
ABSTRACT
FDG PET images of the thorax can be analyzed semiquantitatively using standardized uptake ratios (SUR) or activity ratios between abnormal and normal tissue, or qualitatively by visual comparison of the abnormality to normal structures. Standardized uptake ratio evaluation of FDG PET images has been shown to accurately differentiate benign from malignant focal pulmonary abnormalities. The accuracy of activity ratios and visual analysis have not been evaluated. We therefore prospectively analyzed FDG PET images in patients with pulmonary abnormalities to evaluate differences in analytic schemes. Methods: We evaluated 107 patients with an indeterminate focal abnormality on chest radiograph or CT with FDG PET between November 1991 and March 1993. The PET studies were evaluated using SUR, activity ratios and visual analysis. Activity ratios of maximum activity/cc and average activity/cc between regions of interest (ROIs) in abnormalities and normal lung on the contralateral side were calculated. Visual interpretations were graded on a five-point scale of two observers' confidence of malignancy. FDG uptake in the abnormality was also visually graded in comparison to mediastinal activity. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas were generated for the SUR data, activity ratios and visual analysis. Results: Of 88 patients in which a conclusive diagnosis was made, 61 (69%) patients had malignancy and 27 (31%) patients had a benign process. SUR, maximum activity ratio, average activity ratio and visual interpretation ROC curve areas were 0.96, 0.95, 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. Conclusions: SUR, activity ratios and visual evaluation are each equally accurate methods of FDG PET data analysis in differentiating malignant from benign focal pulmonary abnormalities.
Key Words: PET fluorine-18-FDG lung neoplasms
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Hellwig, T. P. Graeter, D. Ukena, A. Groeschel, G. W. Sybrecht, H.-J. Schaefers, and C.-M. Kirsch 18F-FDG PET for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer: Which SUV Threshold Makes Sense? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1761 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yasufuku, T. Nakajima, K. Motoori, Y. Sekine, K. Shibuya, K. Hiroshima, and T. Fujisawa Comparison of Endobronchial Ultrasound, Positron Emission Tomography, and CT for Lymph Node Staging of Lung Cancer. Chest, September 1, 2006; 130(3): 710 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hashimoto, T. Tsujikawa, C. Kondo, M. Maki, M. Momose, A. Nagai, T. Ohnuki, T. Nishikawa, and K. Kusakabe Accuracy of PET for Diagnosis of Solid Pulmonary Lesions with 18F-FDG Uptake Below the Standardized Uptake Value of 2.5 J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bunyaviroch and R. E. Coleman PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 451 - 469. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Juweid, G. A. Wiseman, J. M. Vose, J. M. Ritchie, Y. Menda, J. E. Wooldridge, F. M. Mottaghy, E. M. Rohren, N. M. Blumstein, A. Stolpen, et al. Response Assessment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by Integrated International Workshop Criteria and Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4652 - 4661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nomori, K. Watanabe, T. Ohtsuka, T. Naruke, K. Suemasu, and K. Uno Visual and Semiquantitative Analyses for F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Scanning in Pulmonary Nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in Size Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 984 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Higashi, K. Ito, Y. Hiramatsu, T. Ishikawa, T. Sakuma, I. Matsunari, G. Kuga, K. Miura, T. Higuchi, H. Tonami, et al. 18F-FDG Uptake by Primary Tumor as a Predictor of Intratumoral Lymphatic Vessel Invasion and Lymph Node Involvement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of a Multicenter Study J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 267 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Chen, M. A. Mintun, and D. P. Schuster Comparison of Methods to Quantitate 18F-FDG Uptake with PET During Experimental Acute Lung Injury J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1583 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Schaffler, G. Wolf, H. Schoellnast, R. Groell, A. Maier, F. M. Smolle-Juttner, M. Woltsche, G. Fasching, R. Nicoletti, and R. M. Aigner Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Evaluation of Pleural Abnormalities on CT Scans with 18F FDG PET Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 858 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Cheran, N. D. Nielsen, and E. F. Patz Jr. False-Negative Findings for Primary Lung Tumors on FDG Positron Emission Tomography: Staging and Prognostic Implications Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1129 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kahn, Y. Menda, K. Kernstine, D. Bushnell, K. McLaughlin, S. Miller, and K. Berbaum The Utility of 99mTc Depreotide Compared With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Surgical Staging in Patients With Suspected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 494 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. V. Gonzalez-Stawinski, A. Lemaire, F. Merchant, E. O'Halloran, R. E. Coleman, D. H. Harpole, and T. A. D'Amico A comparative analysis of positron emission tomography and mediastinoscopy in staging non-small cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1900 - 1904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Demura, T. Tsuchida, T. Ishizaki, S. Mizuno, Y. Totani, S. Ameshima, I. Miyamori, M. Sasaki, and Y. Yonekura 18F-FDG Accumulation with PET for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions in the Thorax J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 540 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Graeter, D. Hellwig, K. Hoffmann, D. Ukena, C.-M. Kirsch, and H.-J. Schafers Mediastinal lymph node staging in suspected lung cancer: comparison of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and mediastinoscopy Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 231 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Cho, H. K. Ha, J. Y. Byun, J. M. Lee, C. J. Kim, S. E. Nam-Koong, and J. M. Lee Usefulness of FDG PET for Assessment of Early Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 391 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. D'Amico, T. Z. Wong, D. H. Harpole, S. D. Brown, and R. E. Coleman Impact of computed tomography-positron emission tomography fusion in staging patients with thoracic malignancies Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 160 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Marom, S. Sarvis, J. E. Herndon, and E. F. Patz Jr T1 Lung Cancers: Sensitivity of Diagnosis with Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Nabi and J. M. Zubeldia Clinical Applications of 18F-FDG in Oncology J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2002; 30(1): 3 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A G Pitman, R J Hicks, D S Binns, R E Ware, V Kalff, A F McKenzie, D L Ball, and M P MacManus Performance of sodium iodide based 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules or masses Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2002; 75(890): 114 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Vansteenkiste and S.G. Stroobants The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Gould, C. C. Maclean, W. G. Kuschner, C. E. Rydzak, and D. K. Owens Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules and Mass Lesions: A Meta-analysis JAMA, February 21, 2001; 285(7): 914 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. Patz Jr 1999 Plenary Session: Friday Imaging Symposium : Evaluation of Focal Pulmonary Abnormalities with FDG PET RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 1182 - 1185. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Farrell, H. P. McAdams, J. E. Herndon, and E. F. Patz Jr Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: FDG PET for Nodal Staging in Patients with Stage I Disease Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 886 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. Patz Jr., J. Connolly, and J. Herndon Prognostic Value of Thoracic FDG PET Imaging After Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 769 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Vansteenkiste, S. G. Stroobants, P. J. Dupont, P. R. De Leyn, E. K. Verbeken, G. J. Deneffe, L. A. Mortelmans, and M. G. Demedts Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 1999; 17(10): 3201 - 3206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Shulkin, N. W. Thompson, B. Shapiro, I. R. Francis, and J. C. Sisson Pheochromocytomas: Imaging with 2-[Fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Coleman, C. M. Laymon, and T. G. Turkington FDG Imaging of Lung Nodules: A Phantom Study Comparing SPECT, Camera-based PET, and Dedicated PET Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 823 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Valk, T. R. Pounds, D. M. Hopkins, M. K. Haseman, G. A. Hofer, H. B. Greiss, R. W. Myers, and C. L. Lutrin Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1573 - 1581. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |