JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 34 No. 9 1552-1564
© 1993 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Osdol, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Osdol, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, J. N.

A Distributed Pharmacokinetic Model of Two-Step Imaging and Treatment Protocols: Application to Streptavidin-Conjugated Monoclonal Antibodies and Radiolabeled Biotin

William W. van Osdol, Cynthia Sung, Robert L. Dedrick and John N. Weinstein

Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute
Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation Program, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: John N. Weinstein, MD, NIH, Building 37, Room 5c-25, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.

ABSTRACT

Two-step imaging and treatment protocols involve injecting a suitably prepared monoclonal antibody that can bind both to a specific tumor antigen and to a second reagent which carries a drug or radionuclide. The second component is injected later, after the antibody has distributed throughout the target tumors and been largely cleared from the plasma and normal tissues. We introduce a mathematical model for the analysis of such protocols and apply it to the case of a streptavidinylated monoclonal antibody and radiolabeled biotin diffusing into small, prevascular, densely cellular nodules that represent either primary or metastatic tumors. We examine the distribution of streptavidinylated antibody and radiolabeled biotin within a tumor nodule and compare the two-step protocol to a one-step protocol using radiolabeled antibody. Our analysis predicts that (1) streptavidinylation reduces both the amount of antibody that distributes into the tumor nodule and the homogeneity of that distribution; (2) streptavidinylated antibody in the nodule can be saturated by initial plasma concentrations of free radiolabeled biotin substantially lower than the initial plasma concentration of free streptavidinylated antibody;(3) radiolabeled biotin diffuses rapidly, but binds so quickly that it will not penetrate deeply into the nodule if too low a dose is given. Hence, nonuniform localization of radiolabel may result from a "binding site barrier" to diffusion of either or both components; and (4) the two-step protocol permits imaging sooner after injection of radiolabeled material than the one-step protocol and produces a higher exposure in tumor relative to plasma, even in the presence of antigen turnover.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. D. Winthrop, S. J. DeNardo, H. Albrecht, G. R. Mirick, L. A. Kroger, K. R. Lamborn, C. Venclovas, M. E. Colvin, P. A. Burke, and G. L. DeNardo
Selection and Characterization of Anti-MUC-1 scFvs Intended for Targeted Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2003; 9(10): 3845S - 3853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.