JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 34 No. 8 1282-1286
© 1993 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wakasugi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wakasugi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, H. W.

Metaiodobenzylguanidine: Evaluation of Its Potential as a Tracer for Monitoring Doxorubicin Cardiomyopathy

Shigetoshi Wakasugi, Alan J. Fischman, John W. Babich, H. Thomas Aretz, Ronald J. Callahan, Motoe Nakaki, Robert Wilkinson and H. William Strauss

Division of Nuclear Medicine of the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Departments of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
Department of Pathology, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Alan J. Fischman, MD, PhD, Div. of Nuclear Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.

ABSTRACT

We evaluated alterations in cardiac adrenergic neuron activity and progression of left ventricular dysfunction in comparison with the severity of structural changes using a rat model of adriamycin cardiomyopathy. Rats were treated with adriamycin (2 mg/kg s.c. once a week) for 6, 7, 8 and 9 wk. Accumulation of 125I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) 4 hr after intravenous administration was determined and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated from gated blood-pool images. H & E and Masson-Trichrome stained specimens of the myocardium were examined by light microscopy. Histopathologic examination demonstrated dose-dependent myocyte damage, although there were no differences between the 8-wk and 9-wk groups. LVEF did not differ between controls and the 6-wk group (81.3% ± 5.5% versus 82.1% ± 4.8%, p = ns). LVEF began to decrease slightly in the 7-wk group (75.0% ± 5.7%, p < 0.05) and showed a remarkable decrease in the 8-wk group (53.7% ± 2.6%, p < 0.001). In the 9-wk group, LVEF diminished to 47.9% ± 3.1% (p < 0.001), accompanied by massive pleural effusions and ascites. MIBG accumulation in the heart (%ID/heart) significantly and progressively diminished; 1.42% ± 0.15% in the 6-wk group, 1.06% ± 0.16% in the 7-wk group, 0.77% ± 0.13% in the 8-wk group and 0.34% ± 0.11% in the 9-wk group, respectively p < 0.001, compared to controls (1.99% ± 0.30%). These results demonstrate that MIBG accumulation in the heart showed a greater and more linear dose-dependent decrease than LVEF. Furthermore, MIBG uptake was significantly reduced in the 6-wk group where only mild myocyte damage (isolated vacuolation or myofibrillar loss) was observed. Thus, MIBG may be a sensitive biochemical marker of adriamycin cardiomyopathy.

FOOTNOTES

Note: Review of the manuscript was made under the supervision of Guest Editor Steven M. Larson, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.