|
|
|||||||||
Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Cardiology and Medical Statistics, University Hospital Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Berthe L.F. van Eck-Smit, MD, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Building 1, C4-Q, University Hospital Leiden, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands.
ABSTRACT
Thallium-201 reinjection following 34-hr redistribution imaging improves the detection of viable myocardium but considerably prolongs the total investigation time. We compared the results of immediate 201Tl reinjection with 3-hr redistribution imaging in 120 consecutive patients who were evaluated for myocardial ischemia. Thallium-201 was reinjected immediately following the postexercise study. The images were acquired 1 hr later and reacquired at 3 hr redistribution. A total of 960 segments per imaging series were evaluated, of which 320 (33%) segments showed perfusion defects on the post exercise images. On the 1-hr images, 220 (69%) segments demonstrated enhanced thallium uptake, 97 (30%) segments did not change and 3 (1%) segments showed reverse redistribution. Of the 100 (97 + 3) persistent defects, only12 (4%) segments showed fill-in of 201Tl on 3 hr redistribution images. A total of 49 (15%) segments showed reverse redistribution. Defects on postexercise images were seen in 95 patients (79%) of whom 9 (10%) showed no change on immediate reinjection images. In only 1 (1%) patient was the diagnosis changed from myocardial necrosis to myocardial ischemia after analysis of the 3-hr redistribution images. These data indicate that immediate postexercise reinjection of 201Tl followed by 1-hr image acquisition may be superior to 3-hr redistribution imaging in identifying viable myocardium in patients evaluated for myocardial ischemia. This protocol eliminates the need for an additional series of 34-hr redistribution images and offers the advantages of reduced total imaging time, improved convenience for the patient and increased patient throughput.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Teiger, J. Garot, E. Aptecar, P. Bosio, J. Woscoboinik, J.M. Pernes, P. Gueret, M. Kern, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Dupouy Coronary blood flow reserve and wall motion recovery in patients undergoing angioplasty for myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., February 2, 1999; 20(4): 285 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.G. Niemeyer, A.F.M. Kuijper, J.G. Meeder, M.J.M. Cramer, A.J.M. Cleophas, E.E. van der Wall, and M. G. Niemeyer Comparison of Thallium Scintigraphy and Positron Emission Tomography Angiology, October 1, 1997; 48(10): 843 - 853. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |