|
|
||||||||
Nuclear Medicine Department, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: William J. MacIntyre, PhD, Department of Nuclear Medicine (Gb-3), The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195-5074.
ABSTRACT
In a previous comparison of 202 consecutive patients who underwent myocardial perfusion imaging with both 201Tl SPECT and 82Rb PET, 27 patients were identified as having true-positive 82Rb images, but false-negative 201Tl images. The purpose of this report is to determine the effect of correct image interpretation of coronary artery disease on the final management of those patients and compare it to the previous management scheme where in a negative image was usually accepted as the end point unless clinical symptoms dictated otherwise. A follow-up study of the clinical course and out come of these studies showed that 63% (17/27) of the patients with a true-positive 82Rb PET image were recommended for revascularization procedures. It is doubtful that this majority of patients would have received either surgical or interventional management based on the false-negative 201Tl SPECT procedure alone.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Yoshinaga, B. J.W. Chow, K. Williams, L. Chen, R. A. deKemp, L. Garrard, A. Lok-Tin Szeto, M. Aung, R. A. Davies, T. D. Ruddy, et al. What is the Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jadvar, H. W. Strauss, and G. M. Segall SPECT and PET in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 915 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |