JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 34 No. 2 345-348
© 1993 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Segall, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Segall, G. M.

Quality Assurance of White Blood Cell Labeling with a Test Based on Adherence

Elvira V. Lang, Elizabeth Nigh, Richard S. Eubanks, Jr., Joseph H. Lang and George M. Segall

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Palo Alto and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Elvira V. Lang, MD, Assistant Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology V-114, VAMC, 3801 Miranda Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304.

ABSTRACT

A new quality control assay was developed based on the premise that proper radioactive labeling should not affect the adherence characteristics of white blood cells to nylon fibers. Heparinized whole blood with trace amounts of radioactively labeled white blood cells was passed over nylon fiber columns and eluted in eight fractions. Percent radioactive adherence (%RA) and percent white blood cell adherence (%WBCA) were determined for each fraction. Regression lines (%RA versus %WBCA) were calculated for 9 samples labeled properly with 111In-oxine and for 17 samples intentionally subjected to improper labeling. Properly labeled preparations had a median slope = 1.05 and an intercept = 1%. Improperly labeled preparations had significantly lower slopes and/or higher intercepts. By the use of ± 2 s.d. ranges as indicators of proper labeling (slope of 0.71–1.74; intercept of –35%–37%), the test had 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity. We conclude that proper labeling with 111In-oxine preserves the adherence characteristics of white blood cells, that improper labeling may affect the binding strength of white blood cells (decrease in slope) and/or lead to formation of sticky cell subgroups (increased intercept) and that the quality control assay can objectively assess the impact of labeling on adherence.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.