JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 34 No. 11 1866-1870
© 1993 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Alavi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Alavi, A.

Cholescintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis: Morphine Augmentation Is Superior to Delayed Imaging

Chun K. Kim, Kevin K.M. Tse, Malik Juweid, P. David Mozley, Annemarie Woda and Abass Alavi

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: For correspondence and reprints contact: Chun K. Kim, MD, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029.

ABSTRACT

Morphine-augmented radionuclide hepatobiliary imaging has been used as an alternative to delayed imaging for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Previous studies have indicated that the morphine-augmentation is as useful as, or more useful than, delayed imaging. A careful comparison of the efficacy of the two techniques appears warranted because: (1) most early studies did not compare the efficacy of the two techniques in a single report using comparable patient populations; (2) the reported efficacy of morphine-augmentation is based primarily on study designs which excluded cases of early gallbladder visualization without morphine, while most delayed imaging protocols included these cases; and (3) there were concerns about the potential consequences of a false-negative morphine examination. This study compared the efficacy of morphine-augmentation with delayed imaging in those cases in which the gallbladder was not visualized during the first hour of study. Of 306 consecutive patients who were scanned to rule out acute cholecystitis, the gallbladder was visualized within 1 hr in 215 cases. In the remaining 91 cases, 46 patients had delayed imaging (17 true-positive, 10 true-negative, 19 false-positive and 0 false-negative), and 45 had morphine-augmentation (24 true-positive, 15 true-negative, 4 false-positive and 2 false-negative). The data indicate that delayed imaging has a significantly lower specificity and positive-predictive value for acute cholecystitis than morphine-augmentation and a slightly higher (statistically insignificant) sensitivity and negative-predictive value. These results appear to be supported by a reanalysis of the data that has already been reported in the literature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. M. Strasberg
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
N. Engl. J. Med., June 26, 2008; 358(26): 2804 - 2811.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. S. Breiman, F. V. Coakley, E. M. Webb, J. J. Ellingson, J. P. Roberts, J. Kohr, J. Lutz, N. Knoess, and B. M. Yeh
CT Cholangiography in Potential Liver Donors: Effect of Premedication with Intravenous Morphine on Biliary Caliber and Visualization
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 733 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Krishnamurthy and G. T. Krishnamurthy
Effect of Sequential Administration of an Opioid and Cholecystokinin on Gallbladder Ejection Fraction: Brief Communication
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1463 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.