|
|
||||||||
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
Correspondence: For reprints contact: Harvey A. Ziessman, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd., NW, Washington, DC 20007.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative methods of infusing sincalide for calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) during cholescintigraphy (5 mCi 99mTc-mebrofenin). After gallbladder filling, three methods of infusion were compared in 23 normal volunteers: (1) 0.02 µg/kg as a 3-min infusion, (2) 0.02 µg/kg as a 30-min infusion, and (3) 0.01 µg/kg as a 30-min infusion (14 subjects), all performed on separate days. With the 3-min infusion, the emptying pattern was usually exponential and completed in 15 min. The mean (GBEF) was 52% ± 26% at 20 min and 56% ± 27% at 30 min (range 0%100%). GBEFs were less than 35% in six subjects and 35%38% in four. Side effects were noted by 11/23 subjects. With the slow infusions, emptying was linear; no side effects were noted. With 0.02 µg/kg, the mean GBEF was 50%±27% at 20 min and 70% ± 22% at 30 min (range 26%95%). Similar results were seen with 0.01 µg/kg, but the data were more limited. The 30-min infusion had a higher normalcy rate than the 3-min method (91% versus 74%). Females had significantly lower GBEFs than males (p < 0.05%). We conclude that the slow infusion method is preferable; it is more physiological, results in more complete emptying, has no side effects, has less normal variability, and should improve the specificity of this test. The lower mean female GBEF may have pathophysiological significance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Dufresne, C. Seva, and D. Fourmy Cholecystokinin and gastrin receptors. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 805 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Bartel, M. E. Juweid, J. A. Ponto, and M. M. Graham Corn Oil Emulsion: A Simple Cholecystagogue for Diagnosis of Chronic Acalculous Cholecystitis J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Ziessman, D. A. Jones, L. R. Muenz, and A. K. Agarval Cholecystokinin Cholescintigraphy: Methodology and Normal Values Using a Lactose-Free Fatty-Meal Food Supplement J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1263 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Krishnamurthy, J. Cerulli-Switzer, N. Chapman, and G. T. Krishnamurthy Comparison of Gallbladder Function Obtained with Regular CCK-8 and Pharmacy-Compounded CCK-8 J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 499 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A G Craig, D Peter, G T P Saccone, P Ziesing, A Wycherley, and J Toouli Scintigraphy versus manometry in patients with suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction Gut, March 1, 2003; 52(3): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pons, R. Sopena, M. Hoyos, V. Garrigues, C. Cano, P. Nos, and J. Ponce Quantitative Cholescintigraphy: Selection of Random Dose for CCK-33 and Reproducibility of Abnormal Results J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 446 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Krishnamurthy, S. Krishnamurthy, H. A. Ziessman, and L. R. Muenz What Value Is Normal for Gallbladder Ejection Fraction, and How Is It Established? * Drs Ziessman and Muenz respond: Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 593 - 595. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Ziessman, L. R. Muenz, A. K. Agarwal, and A. A. M. ZaZa Normal Values for Sincalide Cholescintigraphy: Comparison of Two Methods Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 404 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |