JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 33 No. 2 186-191
© 1992 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, B. B.

Comparison of Same-Day Protocols Using Technetium-99m-Sestamibi Myocardial Imaging

Jaekyeong Heo, Jeffrey Kegel, Abdulmassih S. Iskandrian, Virginia Cave and Basil B. Iskandrian

Philadelphia Heart Institute, Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Jaekyeong Heo, MD, Associate Director, Nuclear Cardiology Lab, Philadelphia Heart Institute, Presbyterian Medical Center, 39th and Market Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

ABSTRACT

Two same-day protocols (rest/exercise [Protocol 1] and exercise/rest [Protocol 2]) with sestamibi (hexakis 2-methoxy-2-isobutyl-isonitrile) were performed within 2 to 14 days of each other after randomization. The initial study in each protocol was done using a dose of 185–296 MBq of 99mTc-sestamibi. The second study in each protocol used a dose of 555–925 MBq. SPECT imaging was started 30 to 60 min after injection using a 180° anterior arc. Segmental analysis was interpreted as normal, scar or ischemia (20 segments/patient). Among the protocols, there was concordance in 93% of the segments (593/640 segments). In the 11 patients with coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction who had ischemic abnormality, count densities from abnormal and normal zones were compared between the two protocols. Protocol 1 showed greater count differences between abnormal and normal zones on exercise images with better normalization of abnormality on rest images than Protocol 2 (p < 0.05). Technetium-99m-sestamibi provides high quality images using either of the two same-day protocols. However, the rest/exercise protocol provides better image contrast and ability to detect reversibility of perfusion defects, and is the preferred same-day protocol.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. B. Fram, R. R. Azar, A. W. Ahlberg, L. D. Gillam, J. F. Mitchel, F. J. Kiernan, J. A. Hirst, J. F. Mather, E. Ficaro, G. Cyr, et al.
Duration of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging following resolution of acute ischemia: an angioplasty model
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. L. Zaret and F. J. Wackers
Nuclear Cardiology- First of Two Parts
N. Engl. J. Med., September 9, 1993; 329(11): 775 - 783.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.