|
|
||||||||
Department of Radiation Physics, University of Lund and Department of Toxicology, University of Uppsala, Sweden
Correspondence: For reprints contact: Bo-Anders Jönsson, PhD, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Lund, Lasarettet, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
ABSTRACT
In light of the increased interest in small scale dosimetry, this paper presents a quantitative autoradiographic method for evaluation of heterogeneous activity distribution in tissues. This was studied in rat tissues after administration of 111In-chloride, -oxine, -tropolone, 111In-labeled homologous blood cells and 111In-anti-CEA-F(ab')2, using quantitative whole body autoradiography. Quantification was performed utilizing an image analyzing system designed for whole-body autoradiographs. very heterogeneous activity distribution was found in several tissues including the liver, spleen, kidneys, bone marrow, lymphnodes and testes. Notable was the high 111In uptake in organs characterized as rapidly proliferating, and known to have numerous transferrin receptors. In the gastrointestinal tract, all activity was associated with the intestinal walls. The heterogeneous tissue distribution shown in this investigation accentuates the necessity for performing detailed studies of the tissue distribution of radiopharmaceuticals. This is especially important for the radiation dosimetry of radionuclides emitting beta-particles or low energy electrons. We suggest whole-body autoradiography as an excellent implement to determine local activity concentrations in organs and tissues necessary for accurate absorbed dose calculations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. V.S.V. Neti and R. W. Howell Lognormal Distribution of Cellular Uptake of Radioactivity: Statistical Analysis of {alpha}-Particle Track Autoradiography J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1009 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Howell, P. V. S. V. Neti, M. Pinto, B. I. Gerashchenko, V. R. Narra, and E. I. Azzam Challenges and progress in predicting biological responses to incorporated radioactivity Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2006; 122(1-4): 521 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Grafstrom, B.-A. Jonsson, A. M. El Hassan, J. Tennvall, and S.-E. Strand Rat testis as a radiobiological in vivo model for radionuclides Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 1, 2006; 118(1): 32 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Nettleton, R. S. Lawson, M. C. Prescott, and I. D. Morris Uptake, Localization, and Dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in Human Testes J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 138 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Kassis Cancer Therapy with Auger Electrons: Are We Almost There? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1479 - 1481. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Jonsson, X. Liu, B.-A. Jonsson, M. Ljungberg, and S.-E. Strand A Dosimetry Model for the Small Intestine Incorporating Intestinal Wall Activity and Cross-Doses J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 1657 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Zanzonico Model-Based Versus Patient-Specific Dosimetry: Blurring the Lines J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 1665 - 1666. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |