JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 32 No. 2 350-359
© 1991 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macklis, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Beresford, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macklis, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Beresford, B.

Radiation Hormesis

Roger M. Macklis and Beverly Beresford

Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Department of Radiation Therapy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Roger Macklis, Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Dept. of Radiation Therapy, Harvard Medical School, 50 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115.

ABSTRACT

"Radiation hormesis" is the name given to the putative stimulatory effects of low level ionizing radiation (generally in the range of 1–50 cGy of low-LET radiation). Based on historical and pharmacologic principles reminiscent of some of the major tenets of homeopathy, most of these effects are now generally ascribed to protective feedback systems that, upon exposure to low concentrations of toxins, proceed to stimulate metabolic detoxification and repair networks. The activation of these networks may then result in net beneficial effects on the cell, organism or species. Discussions of possible stimulatory effects of low levels of ionizing radiation have recently become entangled with the separate but related question of whether a thresh-old dose level exists on the radiotoxicologic dose-response curve. This review summarizes some of the relevant historical and scientific data bearing on the question of radiation hormesis. We find the data in support of most of the hormesis postulates intriguing but inconclusive.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
P. Bellavite, R. Ortolani, F. Pontarollo, G. Pitari, and A. Conforti
Immunology and Homeopathy. 5. The Rationale of the 'Simile'
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 1, 2007; 4(2): 149 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K N Prasad
Rationale for using multiple antioxidants in protecting humans against low doses of ionizing radiation
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2005; 78(930): 485 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
K. N. Prasad, W. C. Cole, and G. M. Hasse
Health Risks of Low Dose Ionizing Radiation in Humans: A Review
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2004; 229(5): 378 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.