JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 32 No. 11 2050-2055
© 1991 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, S. P.

A Decision Analysis Approach to the Treatment of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Emboli and an Intermediate Probability Lung Scan

Richard J. Quinn and S. Patrick Butler

Nuclear Medicine Department, Lidcombe Hospital, Lidcombe, Australia
Nuclear Medicine Department, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence: For reprints contact: R.J. Quinn, FRACP, Staff Specialist in Nuclear Medicine, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, St. George Hospital, Belgrave St., Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia.

ABSTRACT

There remains no clear consensus as to the appropriate further investigation and management of the patient suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE) who has an intermediate lung scan. Clinical assessment is documented as unreliable, yet many of these patients are unlikely to be treated or to have further tests despite a 36% chance of having PE. Using Medical Decision Analysis, four management strategies for such patients have been examined in terms of mortality and morbidity up to 6 mo post-presentation. The strategies were: (1) treat all patients; (2) treat no patients; (3) perform pulmonary angiography; and (4) perform contrast venography. In the last two strategies, the patients with positive examinations are treated; those with negative examinations are not treated. An extensive literature review was performed to provide probability estimates of chance events and outcomes. If all patients are treated, there is 96.8% chance of survival, with an 85.8% chance of survival with no major complications. If no patients are treated, survival is 89.3% and complication-free survival is 89.3%. Angiography and venography results were 96.7%, 93.1% and 94.6% and 89.6%, respectively. We conclude that in patients suspected of PE who have intermediate lung scan results, the optimal strategy is pulmonary angiography since this results in the highest survival with the lowest complications.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
G Saro, J F Campo, M J Hernández, M Anta, J M Olmos, J González-Macías, and J A Riancho
Diagnostic approach to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a report from the real world
Postgrad. Med. J., May 1, 1999; 75(883): 285 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.