|
|
||||||||
Yale University School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Nuclear Imaging Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Internal Medicine (Section of Cardiology), New Haven, Connecticut
Correspondence: For reprints contact: Frans J. Th. Wackers, MD, Director, Cardiovascular Nuclear Imaging and Exercise Laboratories, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, TE-2, New Haven, CT 06510.
ABSTRACT
Standard interpolative background subtraction, as used for thallium-201 (201Tl), may create artifacts when applied to planar technetium-99m-Sestamibi (99mTc-Sestamibi) images, apparently because of the oversubtraction of relatively high extra-cardiac activity. A modified background subtraction algorithm was developed and compared to standard background subtraction in 16 patients who had both exercise-delayed 201Tl and exercise-rest 99mTc-Sestamibi imaging. Furthermore, a new normal data base was generated. Normal 99mTc-Sestamibi distribution was slightly different compared to 201Tl. Using standard background subtraction, mean defect reversibility was significantly underestimated by 99mTc-Sestamibi compared to 201Tl (2.8 ± 4.9 versus 1.8 ± 8.4, p < 0.05). Using the modified background subtraction, mean defect reversibility on 201Tl and 99mTc-Sestamibi images was comparable (2.8 ± 4.9 versus 1.7 ± 5.2, p = NS). We conclude, that for quantification of 99mTc-Sestamibi images a new normal data base, as well as a modification of the interpolative background subtraction method should be employed to obtain quantitative results comparable to those with 201Tl.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. D. Miller The Growing Flood of Technetium-99m Myocardial Perfusion Agents : More Water . . . or More Mud? Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 555 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |