JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 31 No. 1 75-83
© 1990 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humm, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Humm, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, L. M.

Nonuniformity of Tumor Dose in Radioimmunotherapy

J. L. Humm and L. M. Cobb

Cancer Research Campaign Laboratories, Department of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
Division of Experimental, Pathology and Therapeutics, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, Didcot, UK

Correspondence: For reprints contact: J.L. Humm, PhD, Joint Center for Radiation Therapy and Dept. of Radiation Therapy, Harvard Medical School, 50 Binney St., Boston MA 02115.

ABSTRACT

The conventional approach to calculating tumor radiation dose from internally administered radioisotopes is by the MIRD schema. The raw input data for such dose calculations is obtained by immunoscintigraphic methods, PLANAR or SPECT imaging. Limitations in the spatial resolution of these techniques can lead to a considerable underestimate of the gross variation in tumor dose. The use of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies for therapy can result in large nonuniformities in tumor dose. This paper discusses how antibody distribution can influence the energy deposition in the nuclei of target cells. Heterogeneity of antibody binding will lead to an expected decrease in the effectiveness of the radiation delivered. However, enhanced cell killing is possible if the radiolabeled Ab binds to the cell surface membrane and may be further enhanced if the Ab is internalized. Calculations are presented for two cases: (a) a three-dimensional random packing arrangement of cells as a model of the astructural nondifferentiated form seen in some tumors, and (b) differentiated carcinoma of the colon with the cells in tubules. Results for the magnitude of the mean energy deposition to individual cell nuclei from: (a) cell membrane bound 211At, 199Au, 131I, and 90Y-labeled Abs, and (b) a uniform distribution of these sources, as a function of internuclear distance for the two histologies are presented. Energy deposition in tumor cell nuclei from membrane bound radiolabeled antibody may be several times greater than estimated with the assumption of a uniform source distribution.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Kramer, J. L. Humm, M. M. Souweidane, P. B. Zanzonico, I. J. Dunkel, W. L. Gerald, Y. Khakoo, S. D. Yeh, H. W. Yeung, R. D. Finn, et al.
Phase I Study of Targeted Radioimmunotherapy for Leptomeningeal Cancers Using Intra-Ommaya 131-I-3F8
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5465 - 5470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. R. Prideaux, H. Song, R. F. Hobbs, B. He, E. C. Frey, P. W. Ladenson, R. L. Wahl, and G. Sgouros
Three-Dimensional Radiobiologic Dosimetry: Application of Radiobiologic Modeling to Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Imaging-Based Internal Dosimetry
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 1008 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
X.-Q. Lu and W. S. Kiger III
Microdosimetric analysis for high LET radiation
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2006; 122(1-4): 374 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. W. Howell, P. V. S. V. Neti, M. Pinto, B. I. Gerashchenko, V. R. Narra, and E. I. Azzam
Challenges and progress in predicting biological responses to incorporated radioactivity
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2006; 122(1-4): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. P. Leonard, M. Coleman, L. Kostakoglu, A. Chadburn, E. Cesarman, R. R. Furman, M. W. Schuster, R. Niesvizky, D. Muss, J. Fiore, et al.
Abbreviated Chemotherapy With Fludarabine Followed by Tositumomab and Iodine I 131 Tositumomab for Untreated Follicular Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5696 - 5704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Emfietzoglou, K. Kostarelos, A. Papakostas, W.-H. Yang, A. Ballangrud, H. Song, and G. Sgouros
Liposome-Mediated Radiotherapeutics Within Avascular Tumor Spheroids: Comparative Dosimetry Study for Various Radionuclides, Liposome Systems, and a Targeting Antibody
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 89 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Sgouros
Dosimetry of Internal Emitters
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 18S - 27S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. V.S.V. Neti and R. W. Howell
When May a Nonuniform Distribution of 131I Be Considered Uniform? An Experimental Basis for Multicellular Dosimetry
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 2019 - 2026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Akabani, S. J. Kennel, and M. R. Zalutsky
Microdosimetric Analysis of {alpha}-Particle-Emitting Targeted Radiotherapeutics Using Histological Images
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 792 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1990 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.