JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 29 No. 9 1492-1497
© 1988 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purut, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Purut, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.

A New Method to Determine Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Loops in the Clinical Setting

Cemil M. Purut, Timothy L. Sell and Robert H. Jones

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Robert H. Jones, MD, P.O. Box 2986, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

ABSTRACT

Left ventricular pressure-volume (P-V) loops provide a complete definition of cardiac performance but have been difficult to obtain in the clinical setting. Accordingly, we have developed a new technique for acquiring P-V loops during and after cardiac surgical procedures using portable first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography coupled with intraventricular micromanometer catheters. Using this technique 35 serial left ventricular P-V loops were acquired in 12 patients during and after coronary artery bypass grafting. Dynamic radionuclide left ventricular volume and micromanometer pressure were acquired simultaneously to generate the P-V loops. Moreover, simultaneous measurement of both volume and pressure allowed comparison of the timing of end diastole (ED) and end systole (ES) defined by each of the two cardiac parameters. For 208 EDs and 243 ESs analyzed volume-defined ED occurred 8 ± 27 msec (s.d.) later in the cardiac cycle than pressure-defined ED while volume-defined ES occurred 29 ± 27 msec (s.d.) earlier than pressure-defined ES. It is concluded that measurement of cardiac P-V loops with this new technique is clinically feasible and that a close agreement has been demonstrated between the timing of cardiac events defined either by volume or pressure criteria.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.