JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 29 No. 11 1786-1789
© 1988 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonaduce, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chiariello, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonaduce, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chiariello, M.

Diastolic Function in Acute Myocardial Infarction:A Radionuclide Study

Domenico Bonaduce, Gianfranco Morgano, Mario Petretta, Pasquale Arrichiello, Gabriele Conforti, Sandro Betocchi, Marco Salvatore and Massimo Chiariello

Institute of lnternal Medicine, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Surgery and Institute of Nuclear Medicine, 2nd School of Medicine, Naples, Italy

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Domenico Bonaduce, MD, via Aniello Falcone 394, 80127 Naples, Italy.

ABSTRACT

We studied left ventricular diastolic function by equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography in patients as follows: 75 with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 35 with anterior or anteroseptal necrosis (Group A) and 40 with inferior, inferolateral, or posterior necrosis(Group I). The ejection fraction (EF) was lower in Group A than Group I (41.9 ±2.5 vs. 57.1 ±2.0%, p < 0.001), as was peak diastolic filling rate normalized to end diastolic volume(PDFR-EDV/sec) (1.9 ±0.1 vs.2.4 ±0.1 EDV/sec,p < 0.05).PDFR normalized to stroke volume was similar in both groups. An excellent linear correlation was found between EF and PDFR-EDV/sec in the total study population. Isovolumic relaxation period (IRP) was beyond our upper normal value of 94 msec in 64% of patients and it was shorter in Group A than I (95.8 ±12.7 vs. 147.0 ±13.6 msec, p < 0.05). The presence of shorter IRP in Group A than in I is probably a result of an earlier mitral valve opening as a consequence of higher left atrial pressure







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.