JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 29 No. 10 1656-1661
© 1988 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lear, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Horgan, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lear, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Horgan, J. G.

Quantitative Measurement of Renal Perfusion Following Transplant Surgery

James L. Lear, Ulrich Raff, Ravi Jain and J. Gerard Horgan

Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado

Correspondence: For reprints contact: James L. Lear, MD, Nuclear Medicine (A034), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Ave., Denver, CO 80262.

ABSTRACT

We developed an easily implemented clinical procedure for quantitative perfusion measurements in transplanted kidneys using intravenously administered [99mTc]DTPA and the tracer fractionation technique. F = A*(T) / o{int}T [Aa(t)/Va] dt, where F = renal blood flow, A*(T) = DTPA activity in kidney at time = T, Va = ultrasonographically measured femoral artery segment volume, T = time postinjection of F determination, and Aa(t) = time course of DTPA activity in femoral artery segment. The technique was applied to a group of 80 studies in 35 patients in whom an independent clinical determination of transplant function was available. Blood flow (units of ml/min) measured 439 ± 83 in normally functioning transplants, 248 ± 63 in transplants with acute tubular necrosis, 128 ± 62 in transplants with rejection, and 284 ± 97 in transplants with cyclosporine toxicity. These preliminary results indicate potential usefulness of this method in the evaluation of renal function following transplant surgery.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.