JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28 No. 3 372-377
© 1987 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waller, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ackery, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waller, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ackery, D. M.

Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate with Technetium-99m DTPA: Comparison of Plasma Clearance Techniques

Derek G. Waller, Christopher M. Keast, John S. Fleming and Duncan M. Ackery

University Clinical Pharmacology and Nuclear Medicine Groups, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, England

Correspondence: For reprints contact: D.G. Waller, MD, Clinical Pharmacology Group, CF105, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton-SO9 4XY, England.

ABSTRACT

We have compared several techniques for measuring [99mTc]DTPA plasma clearance following single injection to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Half hourly measurements of disappearance of plasma activity were used to calculate a reference GFR corrected for one-pool assumption and body surface area. Alternative methods involving (i) single blood sample, (ii) two blood samples, (iii) external detector clearance rate, and (iv) a combination of (i) and (iii) were then compared. Closest correlations were obtained with (i) two blood samples at 2 hr and 4 hr (s.e.e. 2.8 ml/min) and (i.v.) external rate constant from 2–5 hr with a blood sample at 3 hr (s.e.e. 3.0 ml/min). Correlations with single blood sample were closest at 3 hr and 4 hr postinjectjon (s.e.e. 5.4 and 4.5 ml/min, respectively). External detector disappearance rate constant alone was least accurate (s.e.e. >10 ml. min).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
Y.-C. Ma, L. Zuo, C.-L. Zhang, M. Wang, R.-F. Wang, and H.-Y. Wang
Comparison of 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging with modified MDRD equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese patients in different stages of chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 417 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
Y.-C. Ma, L. Zuo, J.-H. Chen, Q. Luo, X.-Q. Yu, Y. Li, J.-S. Xu, S.-M. Huang, L.-N. Wang, W. Huang, et al.
Modified Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equation for Chinese Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 2937 - 2944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.