JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28 No. 3 354-359
© 1987 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moretti, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Blau, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moretti, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Blau, M.

Effect of Antidepressant and Narcoleptic Drugs on N-Isopropyl p-Iodoamphetamine Biodistribution in Animals

J.L. Moretti, B.L. Holman, L. Delmon, A. Carmel, D. Johnson, P. Moingeon and M. Blau

Laboratoire de Biophysique Experimentale, CHU H. Mondor, Creteil, France
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For reprints contact: B. Leonard Holman, MD, Dept. of Radiology, Div. of Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.

ABSTRACT

N-isopropyi p-iodoamphetamine (IMP) demonstrates a high affinity for lung and brain during the first pass following intravenous injection. Its high brain affinity has been used to advantage for cerebral perfusion imaging, but the effects of drugs on IMP distribution could affect its utility. In this study, we determined the effects of the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine and the MAO inhibitors deprenyl and phenelzine on the biodistribution of IMP. We first determined the effect of loading dose and anesthesia on the biodistribution of IMP. In rats, biodistribution was not dependent on loading dose between 0.1 and 1.1 mg/kg. Anesthesia with thiopental and chloral hydrate depressed lung and brain IMP uptake. In rats, preloading doses of imipramine depressed lung uptake but did not result in increased brain IMP uptake; postloading doses of imipramine did not release IMP from the lung. In rabbits, simultaneous or postloading doses of imipramine resulted in release of IMP from the lung with an increase in brain activity. Both mixed A and B MAO inhibitors (phenelzine) and B selective MAO inhibitors (deprenyl) did not affect IMP distribution in rats. Based on the action of imipramine on IMP uptake and clearance in the lung, we postulate that IMP uptake and metabolism within the lung is related to the mixed function oxidase (MFO) system. As the lung is rich in the MFO system in humans, we would also predict from this study that IMP distribution in patients under antidepressant therapy would not be affected by either tricyclic or MAO inhibitor agents apart from the effect of these drugs on cerebral perfusion.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.