JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28 No. 12 1881-1887
© 1987 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coveney, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coveney, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, M. S.

Comparison of Technetium-99m MAG3 Kit with HPLC-Purified Technetium-99m MAG3 and OIH in Rats

Joseph R. Coveney and Mark S. Robbins

Pharmacology and Toxicology Research, Mallinckrodt, Inc.; Hazelwood, Missouri

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Joseph R. Coveney, PhD, Mallinckrodt, Inc., 675 McDonnell Blvd., Hazelwood, MO 63042.

ABSTRACT

Technetium-99m (99mTc) mercaptoacetylglycylglycylglycine (MAG3) in high (≥95%) radiochemical purity is prepared from lyophilized kits containing benzoylMAG3, sodium tartrate, lactose, and stannous chloride by adding sodium [99mTc]pertechnetate and heating the contents briefly. Constant-infusion renal whole-blood clearance obtained with [99mTc] MAG3, kits was compared with that obtained with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pure [99mTc]MAG3 and with co-infused iodine-131(131I)iodohippurate (OIH) in anesthetized rats. Average renal whole-blood clearance of [99mTc]MAG3 from kits was 3.9 ± 0.4 ml/min/100 g body weight (mean ± s.e.m. n = 5) and that for HPLC-pure [99mTc]MAG3 was 4.6 ± 0.3 (n = 3). Renal whole-blood clearance ratios for [99mTc]MAG3 to co-infused iodine-131(131I) OIH were greater than unity for both kit formulation (1.7 ± 0.1) and HPLC-pure [99mTc]MAG3 (1.9 ± 0.2). Differences in these two measures were not significant. Plasma binding (determined from blood drawn at the end of the infusion) of [99mTc]MAG3 prepared from both kits (75 ± 2%, n = 4) and HPLC-separation (76 ± 4%) were greater than that of [131I]OIH in corresponding plasma samples (31 ± 1% and 32 ± 2%, respectively). Renograms performed in anesthetized rats revealed no statistically significant differences between kit prepared [99mTc]MAG3 and [131I]OIH in terms of time-to-peak renal activity (5.0 ± 1.7 min, n = 6; and 2.2 ± 0.2 min, n = 3, mean ± s.e.m. for [99mTc]MAG3 and [131I]OIH, respectively), in terms of time to fall to half-maximal activity (15.3 ± 2.4 min and 9.6 ± 2.1 min, respectively), or in terms of fraction of peak radioactivity in right kidney (0.53 ± 0.01 for both substances). To assess possible interference from hepatobiliary uptake and excretion in renal failure, radioactivity in liver regions of interest was followed by gamma camera scintigraphy for 30 min after intravenous injection of [131I]OIH and kit and HPLC-purified [99mTc]MAG3, in anesthetized rats rendered anephric by ligating renal peduncles. Liver activity was 25% of total for both preparations of [99mTc]MAG3 and was 22% of total for [131I]OIH. There were no significant differences among the substances.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.