JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28 No. 1 25-33
© 1987 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carlo, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carlo, D. J.

Clinical Parameters Related to Optimal Tumor Localization of Indium-111-Labeled Mouse Antimelanoma Monoclonal Antibody ZME-018

James L. Murray, Michael G. Rosenblum, Lamk Lamki, Howard J. Glenn, Zdenko Krizan, Evan M. Hersh, Carl E. Plager, Richard M. Bartholomew, Michael W. Unger and Dennis J. Carlo

Departments of Clinical Immunology and Biological Therapy, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Oncology, UT M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston, Texas
Hybritech, Incorporated, San Diego, California

Correspondence: For reprints contact: James Lee Murray, MD, Clinical Immunology, Box 41, M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, 6723 Bertner Ave., Houston, TX 77030.

ABSTRACT

Radioimmunolocalization of an 111In-labeled mouse antimelanoma monoclonal antibody (MoAb), ZME-018, was examined in 21 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Each patient received a single. i.v. infusion of MoAb at concentrations ranging from 1 mg to 20 mg, coupled to 5 mCi 111In by the chelating agent DPTA. No toxicity was observed in any patient. Total-body and regions of interest scans performed at 4, 24, and 72 hr following MoAb administration revealed uptake in 63 out of 105 previously diagnosed metastases for an overall sensitivity of 60%. Uptake was consistently observed in liver/spleen, and less frequently in bowel, testes, axillae and bone. Sensitivity of detection increased significantly at doses of MoAb above 2.5 mg, with 74% of lesions imaging at 20 mg/5 mCi compared with 29% at 2.5 mg/5 mCi (p < 0.005). A significant correlation was observed between tumor uptake of 111In-MoAb conjugate and increasing tumor size. Soft-tissue lesions such as skin and lymph node metastases were imaged to a greater extent (76%) than visceral metastases (19%). In five of six patients, biopsies obtained from 3 days to 14 days after MoAb administration showed antibody present on tumor cells as demonstrated by flow cytometry and/or radioimmunoassay. Human anti-murine immunoglobulin responses were observed in seven of 17 patients studied. Mean plasma clearance of ZME-018 was prolonged with a T1/2 of 24.7 hr and increased slightly with increasing MoAb dose. Urinary excretion of 111In averaged 12.4% of the injected dose over 48 hours. Radioimmunolocalization of melanoma with 111In-labeled ZME-018 appears feasible. The sensitivity of the technique was related to dose, tumor size, and disease site.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.