JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 27 No. 9 1442-1448
© 1986 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva-Meyer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mena, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva-Meyer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mena, I.

Use of Factor Analysis in the Evaluation of Left to Right Cardiac Shunts

Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Laurent Philippe, Servio Cordero, Carol S. Marcus and Ismael Mena

Division of Nuclear Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Ismael Mena, MD, Director Division Nuclear Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St., Torrance CA 90509.

ABSTRACT

We have compared two methods of data processing for the quantitation of left-to-right cadiac shunts using first-pass radionuclide angiography. These two methods are used for curve generation in the deconvolution analysis. The standard method involves manual definition of regions of interest. A newer method—factor analysis—provides automatic curve generation and is therefore more operator-independent. Both techniques yield curves of the venous input, lung, and background. The venous input curve is deconvolved by the lung curve, and the resultant unit impulse response is fitted by the gamma variate method to quantitate the left-to-right shunt fraction. Both techniques—factor analysis and regions of interest (ROIs)—separated the shunt patients (n = 16) from the control subjects (n = 20) with a p < 0.001. There was less interobserver variability with the curves obtained by factor analysis than with those obtained by regions of interest. The coefficient of correlation of factor analysis results with oximetry, r, was 0.90. High sensitivity and specificity, each 94%, was achieved with curves generated by factor analysis. Time vs. activity curves generated by ROIs can achieve high sensitivity and low specificity, or vice versa, depending on the cutoff level defined for separation of the left-to-right shunt patients from the control group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Arheden, C. Holmqvist, U. Thilen, K. Hanséus, G. Björkhem, O. Pahlm, S. Laurin, and F. Ståhlberg
Left-to-Right Cardiac Shunts: Comparison of Measurements Obtained with MR Velocity Mapping and with Radionuclide Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 453 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.