JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 27 No. 8 1358-1361
© 1986 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jagust, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Knittel, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jagust, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Knittel, B. L.

Methodologic Factors Affecting PET Measurements of Cerebral Glucose Metabolism

William J. Jagust, Thomas F. Budinger, Ronald H. Huesman, Robert P. Friedland, Bernard M. Mazoyer and Brian L. Knittel

Department of Neurology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Martinez
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis
Donner Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California

Correspondence: For reprints contact: William J. Jagust, MD, Dept. of Neurology (127), VA Medical Center, 150 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553.

ABSTRACT

Measurements of cerebral glucose utilization rates in similar populations of human subjects under similar conditions vary considerably because of methods used in data collection and analysis. Using data acquired in two patients, we evaluated the effects of time schedule of data collection, region of interest size, method of attenuation correction, and input function shape on LCMRglu determined by dynamic positron emission tomographic scanning and calculation of rate constants. These different strategies of data acquisition and analysis produced variations of 3 to 14% in calculated LCMRglu. These factors, in conjunction with the well described effects of instrument resolution and sensitivity may account for data discrepancies in the literature.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.