JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 27 No. 7 1116-1124
© 1986 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLean, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ege, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLean, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ege, G. N.

Prognostic Value of Axillary Lymphoscintigraphy in Breast Carcinoma Patients

Richard G. McLean and Günes N. Ege

Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Günes N. Ege, MD, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, The Princess Margaret Hospital, 500 Sherbourne St. Toronto, Ontario, M4X 1K9 Canada.

ABSTRACT

Axillary lymphoscintigraphy (AxLS) with bilateral interdigital injection of [99mTc]antimony sulfide colloid carried out concurrently with internal mammary lymphoscintigraphy in 488 patients with breast carcinoma was evaluated. Patterns of radiocolloid distribution within the ipsilateral axilla and supraclavicular fossa were compared with similar features on the contralateral side to determine whether image characteristics (a) are significantly disrupted by prior surgery, (b) reflect the presence of metastases, and (c) can predict treatment failure. Interpretive criteria for AxLS were refined after correlation of the identified image components with clinical parameters including axillary surgery, lymph node histology and relapse within a follow-up period of 2 years from the study. Results indicate that AxLS is at least as accurate as clinical assessment and provides data predictive of relapse to complement axillary lymph node status although the technique cannot presently replace lymph node sampling for patient staging.

FOOTNOTES

* This paper was presented in part at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Houston, TX, June 2–5, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. K. Shetty and W. S. Carpenter
Sonographic Evaluation of Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Nodes Identified on Mammograms
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. L. Dillehay, B. R. Krynyckyi, and C. K. Kim
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 139 - 145.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G Cserni
Axillary staging of breast cancer and the sentinel node
J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2000; 53(10): 733 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. T. Yang, J. Chang, and C. Metreweli
Patients with Breast Cancer: Differences in Color Doppler Flow and Gray-Scale US Features of Benign and Malignant Axillary Lymph Nodes
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 568 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.