JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 27 No. 6 795-803
© 1986 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kasina, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Kasina, S.

Comparison of Iodine-131 OIH and Technetium-99m MAG3 Renal Imaging in Volunteers

Andrew Taylor, Jr. , Dennis Eshima, Alan R. Fritzberg, Paul E. Christian and Sudhakar Kasina

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine; and Veterans Administration Medical Center Salt Lake City, Utah

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Andrew Taylor, Jr., MD, Director of Nuclear Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 50 North Medical Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84132.

ABSTRACT

Animal studies have suggested that the nonisomeric N3S triamide mercaptide ligand, 99mTc mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3), may provide a satisfactory 99mTc-labeled replacement for 131I hippurate (OIH). Sequential 30-min [99mTc]MAG3 (5–10 mCi) and [131I]OIH (300 µCi) imaging studies were performed in ten normal volunteers in order to compare the image quality, renal excretion, blood clearance, and time to peak height of the renogram curve. In addition, [99mTc] MAG3 (5 mCi) and [131l]OIH (150 µCi) were administered simultaneously in eight volunteers for comparison of 180-min blood and plasma clearances and urine excretion. In the sequential imaging studies, the blood clearance of [99mTc]MAG3 was more rapid than [131I]OIH with a mean clearance of 1.30 l/min compared with 0.88 l/min for [131I]OIH (p < 0.05). Seventy-three percent of the injected dose of the MAG3 was excreted by 30 min compared with 66.8% for [131I]OIH. Whole kidney and cortical renogram curves showed no significant difference in the time to peak height for MAG3 and [131I]OIH. In all subjects, the quality of the [99mTc]MAG3 images were clearly superior to [131I]OIH. Following simultaneous injection, blood and plasma clearances for [131I]OIH were more rapid than MAG3 when determined for multiple time intervals from 0–30 to 0–180 min (p ≤ 0.05). The 0–30-min clearances of MAG3 and [131I]OIH were only slightly greater than the 0–180-min clearances and can be used to obtain valid comparisons of the two agents. As in the sequential study, 30-min urine excretion was greater for MAG3 than [131I]OIH (73.1 compared with 69.6%) but the difference was not statistically significant. Although the differences in the MAG3 clearances following sequential and simultaneous administration are not satisfactorily explained, the fact that both clearances were rapid, the MAG3 and OIH renogram curves were quite similar, and 30-min urine excretions of MAG3 and OIH were essentially identical suggests that MAG3 may become a 99mTc replacement for [131I]OIH and further clinical evaluation is warranted.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. P. Esteves, A. Taylor, A. Manatunga, R. D. Folks, M. Krishnan, and E. V. Garcia
99mTc-MAG3 Renography: Normal Values for MAG3 Clearance and Curve Parameters, Excretory Parameters, and Residual Urine Volume.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): W610 - W617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. P. Esteves, R. K. Halkar, M. M. Issa, S. Grant, and A. Taylor
Comparison of camera-based 99mTc-MAG3 and 24-hour creatinine clearances for evaluation of kidney function.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): W316 - W319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
M. P. Diaz, E. E. Aparicio, O. D. Rizo, R. R. Diaz, and C. H. Rodriguez
Administered Activity Optimization in 99mTc-MAG3 Renography for Adults
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2003; 31(4): 216 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
P. O. Kiratli and B. Volkan Salanci
Testing Different Storage Conditions for 99mTc-MAG3 Kit: Can Hot Fractioning Reduce the Cost per Unit Dose?
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2003; 31(2): 74 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Zitta, W. Estelberger, H. Holzer, R. W. Lipp, K. Oettl, and G. Reibnegger
Pitfalls of single-sample determination of renal clearance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 2239 - 2243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Eshima, L. Eshima, L. Hansen, M. Lipowska, L. G. Marzilli, and A. Taylor Jr
Effect of Protein Binding on Renal Extraction of 131I-OIH and 99mTc-Labeled Tubular Agents
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2000; 41(12): 2077 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.